• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用高等教育委员会的评估文化矩阵来支持模拟患者项目的持续质量改进。

Using the Higher Learning Commission's Assessment Culture Matrix to Support Continuous Quality Improvement of a Simulated Patient Program.

作者信息

Genereaux Molly, Nguyen Michelle, Bostwick Jolene R, Vordenberg Sarah E

机构信息

University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Innov Pharm. 2021 Apr 26;12(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i2.3684. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.24926/iip.v12i2.3684
PMID:34345520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8326705/
Abstract

The purpose of this commentary is to advocate for the use of the Higher Learning Commission's Assessment Culture Matrix to support continuous quality improvement (CQI) of simulated patient (SP) programs. We will share examples from our program demonstrating our maturation as it relates to leadership, shared mission and vision, faculty, and resources. While we are at the beginning stages of engaging students, we continue to make progress accessing and systematically using assessment data. We anticipate that sharing our process for utilizing this matrix may help other institutions as they conduct CQI with their SP programs and in other areas of their assessment portfolio.

摘要

本评论的目的是提倡使用高等教育委员会的评估文化矩阵,以支持模拟病人(SP)项目的持续质量改进(CQI)。我们将分享我们项目中的实例,展示我们在领导力、共同使命与愿景、教师以及资源方面的成熟过程。虽然我们在让学生参与方面尚处于起步阶段,但在获取和系统使用评估数据方面仍在不断取得进展。我们预计,分享我们使用该矩阵的过程可能会帮助其他机构在对其SP项目以及评估组合的其他领域进行持续质量改进时提供帮助。

相似文献

1
Using the Higher Learning Commission's Assessment Culture Matrix to Support Continuous Quality Improvement of a Simulated Patient Program.运用高等教育委员会的评估文化矩阵来支持模拟患者项目的持续质量改进。
Innov Pharm. 2021 Apr 26;12(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i2.3684. eCollection 2021.
2
Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program.运用计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)模型对已建立的模拟患者项目进行持续质量改进。
Innov Pharm. 2018 Aug 20;9(2):1-6. doi: 10.24926/iip.v9i2.989. eCollection 2018.
3
Quality improvement: the JCAHO model.质量改进:联合委员会国际部(JCAHO)模式
Radiol Manage. 1992 Summer;14(3):45-57.
4
From quality assurance to quality improvement: the Joint Commission and the new quality paradigm.从质量保证到质量改进:联合委员会与新的质量范式
J Qual Assur. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):26-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1991.tb00198.x.
5
Keeping the "continuous" in continuous quality improvement: exploring perceived outcomes of CQI program use in community pharmacy.保持持续质量改进的“连续性”:探索社区药店使用 CQI 计划的感知结果。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jan-Feb;10(1):45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
6
Safety implications of standardized continuous quality improvement programs in community pharmacy.社区药房标准化持续质量改进项目的安全影响
J Pharm Pract. 2013 Jun;26(3):228-36. doi: 10.1177/0897190012452312. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Fostering Student-Faculty Partnerships for Continuous Curricular Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education.促进师生合作,持续改进本科医学教育课程。
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):996-1001. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002726.
8
Understanding uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project.理解原住民初级卫生保健中持续质量改进的采用情况:以 Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease 项目多地点案例研究为例。
Implement Sci. 2010 Mar 13;5:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-21.
9
Accreditation of Medical Education Programs: Moving From Student Outcomes to Continuous Quality Improvement Measures.医学教育项目认证:从学生成果转向持续质量改进措施。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):377-383. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001835.
10
Challenges of standardized continuous quality improvement programs in community pharmacies: the case of SafetyNET-Rx.社区药店标准化持续质量改进计划面临的挑战:以 SafetyNET-Rx 为例。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Nov-Dec;8(6):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality in Standardized Patient Training and Delivery: Retrospective Documentary Analysis of Trainer and Instructor Feedback.标准化病人培训与实施中的质量:培训师和指导教师反馈的回顾性文献分析
Cureus. 2022 Jan 7;14(1):e21022. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21022. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program.运用计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)模型对已建立的模拟患者项目进行持续质量改进。
Innov Pharm. 2018 Aug 20;9(2):1-6. doi: 10.24926/iip.v9i2.989. eCollection 2018.
2
Quality assurance processes for standardized patient programs.标准化病人项目的质量保证流程。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):523-528. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
3
The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.作为标准化病人的益处与风险:文献叙述性综述
Patient. 2016 Feb;9(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0127-y.
4
Use of simulation-based teaching methodologies in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.美国药学院校中基于模拟的教学方法的使用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Apr 12;77(3):53. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77353.