• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高临床警报系统的安全性、有效性和效率:基于模拟的生理监测仪可用性测试。

Improving the Safety, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Clinical Alarm Systems: Simulation-Based Usability Testing of Physiologic Monitors.

作者信息

Sowan Azizeh K, Staggers Nancy, Berndt Andrea, Austin Tommye, Reed Charles C, Malshe Ashwin, Kilger Max, Fonseca Elma, Vera Ana, Chen Qian

机构信息

School of Nursing University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX United States.

School of Nursing and Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT United States.

出版信息

JMIR Nurs. 2021 Feb 3;4(1):e20584. doi: 10.2196/20584. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.2196/20584
PMID:34345793
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328265/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical alarm system safety is a national patient safety goal in the United States. Physiologic monitors are associated with the highest number of device alarms and alarm-related deaths. However, research involving nurses' use of physiologic monitors is rare. Hence, the identification of critical usability issues for monitors, especially those related to patient safety, is a nursing imperative.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined nurses' usability of physiologic monitors in intensive care units with respect to the effectiveness and efficiency of monitor use.

METHODS

In total, 30 nurses from 4 adult intensive care units completed 40 tasks in a simulation environment. The tasks were common monitoring tasks that were crucial for appropriate monitoring and safe alarm management across four categories of competencies: admitting, transferring, and discharging patients using the monitors (7 tasks); managing measurements and monitor settings (23 tasks); performing electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis (7 tasks); and troubleshooting alarm conditions (3 tasks). The nurse-monitor interaction was video-recorded. The principal investigator and two expert intensive care units nurse educators identified, classified, and validated task success (effectiveness) and the time of task completion (efficiency).

RESULTS

Among the 40 tasks, only 2 (5%) were successfully completed by all the nurses. At least 1-27 (3%-90%) nurses abandoned or did not correctly perform 38 tasks. The task with the shortest completion time was "take monitor out of standby" (mean 0:02, SD 0:01 min:s), whereas the task "record a 25 mm/s ECG strip of any of the ECG leads" had the longest completion time (mean 1:14, SD 0:32 min:s). The total time to complete 37 navigation-related tasks ranged from a minimum of 3 min 57 s to a maximum of 32 min 42 s. Regression analysis showed that it took 6 s per click or step to successfully complete a task. To understand the nurses' thought processes during monitor navigation, the authors analyzed the paths of the 2 tasks with the lowest successful completion rates, where only 13% (4/30) of the nurses correctly completed these 2 tasks. Although 30% (9/30) of the nurses accessed the correct screen first for task 1 and task 2, they could not find their way easily from there to successfully complete the 2 tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Usability testing of physiologic monitors revealed major ineffectiveness and inefficiencies in the current nurse-monitor interactions. The results indicate the potential for safety and productivity issues in completing routine tasks. Training on monitor use should include critical monitoring functions that are necessary for safe, effective, efficient, and appropriate monitoring to include knowledge of the shortest navigation path. It is imperative that vendors' future monitor designs mimic clinicians' thought processes for successful, safe, and efficient monitor navigation.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c38/8328265/ba6979894e36/nursing_v4i1e20584_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c38/8328265/ba6979894e36/nursing_v4i1e20584_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c38/8328265/ba6979894e36/nursing_v4i1e20584_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

临床警报系统安全是美国的一项全国性患者安全目标。生理监测仪产生的设备警报及与警报相关的死亡案例数量最多。然而,关于护士使用生理监测仪的研究却很少。因此,识别监测仪的关键可用性问题,尤其是与患者安全相关的问题,是护理工作的当务之急。

目的

本研究考察了重症监护病房护士使用生理监测仪的有效性和效率方面的可用性。

方法

来自4个成人重症监护病房的30名护士在模拟环境中完成了40项任务。这些任务是常见的监测任务,对于四大类能力的适当监测和安全警报管理至关重要:使用监测仪收治、转运和出院患者(7项任务);管理测量和监测仪设置(23项任务);进行心电图(ECG)分析(7项任务);以及排除警报状况故障(3项任务)。对护士与监测仪的互动进行了视频记录。首席研究员和两名重症监护病房专家护士教育工作者确定、分类并验证了任务的成功完成情况(有效性)和任务完成时间(效率)。

结果

在这40项任务中,所有护士仅成功完成了2项(5%)。至少有1至27名(3% - 90%)护士放弃或未正确执行38项任务。完成时间最短的任务是“将监测仪从待机状态中取出”(平均0:02,标准差0:01分:秒),而“记录任何一条心电图导联的25毫米/秒心电图条带”任务的完成时间最长(平均1:14,标准差0:32分:秒)。完成37项与导航相关任务的总时间最短为3分57秒,最长为32分42秒。回归分析表明,成功完成一项任务每次点击或操作需要6秒。为了解护士在监测仪导航过程中的思维过程,作者分析了成功率最低的2项任务的操作路径,只有13%(4/30)的护士正确完成了这2项任务。尽管30%(9/30)的护士在任务1和任务2中首先访问了正确的屏幕,但他们无法从那里轻松找到完成这2项任务的方法。

结论

生理监测仪的可用性测试揭示了当前护士与监测仪互动中存在的重大无效性和低效性。结果表明在完成日常任务时存在安全和生产效率问题的可能性。监测仪使用培训应包括安全、有效、高效和适当监测所需的关键监测功能,包括最短导航路径的知识。供应商未来的监测仪设计必须模仿临床医生成功、安全和高效进行监测仪导航的思维过程。

相似文献

1
Improving the Safety, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Clinical Alarm Systems: Simulation-Based Usability Testing of Physiologic Monitors.提高临床警报系统的安全性、有效性和效率:基于模拟的生理监测仪可用性测试。
JMIR Nurs. 2021 Feb 3;4(1):e20584. doi: 10.2196/20584. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
2
Nurse Competence on Physiologic Monitors Use: Toward Eliminating Alarm Fatigue in Intensive Care Units.护士使用生理监测仪的能力:致力于消除重症监护病房的警报疲劳
Open Med Inform J. 2017 Apr 14;11:1-11. doi: 10.2174/1874431101711010001. eCollection 2017.
3
Changes in Default Alarm Settings and Standard In-Service are Insufficient to Improve Alarm Fatigue in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Project.默认警报设置和标准在职培训的改变不足以改善重症监护病房的警报疲劳:一项试点项目。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Jan 11;3(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.5098.
4
Nurses' Perceptions and Practices Toward Clinical Alarms in a Transplant Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Exploring Key Issues Leading to Alarm Fatigue.心脏移植重症监护病房护士对临床警报的认知与实践:探究导致警报疲劳的关键问题
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Mar 16;2(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4196.
5
Critical care nurses' clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation: An interpretive descriptive study.重症监护护士对生理监护仪报警定制的临床推理:一项解释性描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(15-16):3033-3041. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14866. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
6
Effects of monitor alarm management training on nurses' alarm fatigue: A randomised controlled trial.监护仪警报管理培训对护士警报疲劳的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4203-4216. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15452. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Testing physiologic monitor alarm customization software to reduce alarm rates and improve nurses' experience of alarms in a medical intensive care unit.测试生理监护仪报警定制软件以降低报警率并改善重症监护病房护士对报警的体验。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205901. eCollection 2018.
8
Educational Program for Physiologic Monitor Use and Alarm Systems Safety: A Toolkit.生理监测仪使用与警报系统安全教育项目:工具包
Clin Nurse Spec. 2020 Mar/Apr;34(2):50-62. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000507.
9
Medication Safety Amid Technological Change: Usability Evaluation to Inform Inpatient Nurses' Electronic Health Record System Transition.技术变革中的用药安全:可用性评估以告知住院护士电子病历系统的过渡。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):982-990. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08278-1. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Conducting a representative national randomized control trial of tailored clinical decision support for nurses remotely: Methods and implications.开展具有代表性的全国随机对照试验,对护士进行远程定制临床决策支持:方法与意义。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jul;118:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106712. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
2
State of Science in Alarm System Safety: Implications for Researchers, Vendors, and Clinical Leaders.报警系统安全的科学现状:对研究人员、供应商和临床领导者的启示。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):19-28. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-56.1.19.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of two SpO alarm strategies during automated FiO control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study.评价两种 SpO2 报警策略在新生儿重症监护病房自动 FiO2 控制中的作用:一项随机交叉研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 May 6;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5.
2
Research Outcomes of Implementing CEASE: An Innovative, Nurse-Driven, Evidence-Based, Patient-Customized Monitoring Bundle to Decrease Alarm Fatigue in the Intensive Care Unit/Step-down Unit.实施CEASE的研究成果:一种创新的、由护士主导的、基于证据的、针对患者定制的监测组合,以降低重症监护病房/降级护理病房的警报疲劳。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;38(3):160-173. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000357.
3
Incorporating Observed Physiological Data to Personalize Pediatric Vital Sign Alarm Thresholds.
纳入观察到的生理数据以个性化设置儿科生命体征警报阈值。
Biomed Inform Insights. 2019 Jan 10;11:1178222618818478. doi: 10.1177/1178222618818478. eCollection 2019.
4
Reducing Alarm Fatigue in Two Neonatal Intensive Care Units through a Quality Improvement Collaboration.通过一项质量改进合作,减少两家新生儿重症监护病房的报警疲劳。
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Nov;35(13):1311-1318. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1653945. Epub 2018 May 21.
5
Nurse Competence on Physiologic Monitors Use: Toward Eliminating Alarm Fatigue in Intensive Care Units.护士使用生理监测仪的能力:致力于消除重症监护病房的警报疲劳
Open Med Inform J. 2017 Apr 14;11:1-11. doi: 10.2174/1874431101711010001. eCollection 2017.
6
A Complex Phenomenon in Complex Adaptive Health Care Systems-Alarm Fatigue.复杂适应性医疗保健系统中的一种复杂现象——警报疲劳。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jun 1;171(6):515-516. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.5137.
7
Role of Large Clinical Datasets From Physiologic Monitors in Improving the Safety of Clinical Alarm Systems and Methodological Considerations: A Case From Philips Monitors.生理监测仪的大型临床数据集在提高临床警报系统安全性中的作用及方法学考量:飞利浦监测仪的一个案例
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Sep 30;3(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6427.
8
Changes in Default Alarm Settings and Standard In-Service are Insufficient to Improve Alarm Fatigue in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Project.默认警报设置和标准在职培训的改变不足以改善重症监护病房的警报疲劳:一项试点项目。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Jan 11;3(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.5098.
9
Insights into the problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive care unit patients.对生理监测设备警报疲劳问题的洞察:对连续入住重症监护病房患者的一项全面观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 22;9(10):e110274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110274. eCollection 2014.
10
Nurses' response to frequency and types of electrocardiography alarms in a non-critical care setting: a descriptive study.护士在非重症监护环境下对心电图报警的频率和类型的反应:一项描述性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Feb;51(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Jun 28.