Suppr超能文献

与高剂量阿糖胞苷相比,氯法拉滨可增加原发性 B 前体细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病微小残留病的清除率,但并未改善结局。这是合作急性淋巴细胞白血病研究组 08-09 随机临床试验的结果。

Clofarabine increases the eradication of minimal residual disease of primary B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to high-dose cytarabine without improvement of outcome. Results from the randomized clinical trial 08-09 of the Cooperative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Study Group.

机构信息

Clinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf.

出版信息

Haematologica. 2022 May 1;107(5):1026-1033. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279357.

Abstract

Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve cure for all children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To this end, we investigated the therapeutic potential of clofarabine in primary ALL in trial CoALL 08-09 (clinicaltrials gov. identifier: NCT01228331). The primary study objective was the minimal residual disease (MRD)- based comparative assessment of cytotoxic efficacies of clofarabine 5x40 mg/m2 versus high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) 4x3g/m2, both in combination with PEG-ASP 2,500 IU/m2 as randomized intervention in early consolidation. The secondary objective was an outcome analysis focused on treatment arm dependence and MRD after randomized intervention. In B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL, eradication of MRD was more profound after clofarabine compared to cytarabine, with 93 versus 79 of 143 randomized patients per arm reaching MRD-negativity (c2 test P=0.03, leftsided P [Fisher's exact test]=0.04). MRD status of BCP-ALL after randomized intervention maintained its prognostic relevance, with a significant impact on event-free survival (EFS) and relapse rate. However, no difference in outcome regarding EFS and overall survival (OS) between randomized courses was observed (5-year EFS: clofarabine 85.7, SE=4.1 vs. HIDAC 84.8, SE=4.7 [P=0.96]; OS: 95.7, SE=1.9 vs. 92.2, SE=3.2 [P=0.59]), independent of covariates or overall risk strata. Severe toxicities between randomized and subsequent treatment elements were also without significant difference. In conclusion, clofarabine/PEG-ASP is effective and safe, but greater cytotoxic efficacy of clofarabine compared to HIDAC did not translate into improved outcomes indicating a lack of surrogacy of post-intervention MRD at the trial level as opposed to the patient level, which hampers a broader implementation of this regimen in the frontline treatment of ALL.

摘要

需要新的治疗策略来提高所有急性淋巴细胞白血病 (ALL) 患儿的治愈率。为此,我们在 CoALL 08-09 试验(clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01228331)中研究了克拉屈滨在原发性 ALL 中的治疗潜力。主要研究目标是基于微小残留病 (MRD) 的比较评估,评估 5x40mg/m2 克拉屈滨与 4x3g/m2 高剂量阿糖胞苷 (HIDAC) 的细胞毒性疗效,两者均与 PEG-ASP 2500IU/m2 联合作为早期巩固的随机干预措施。次要目标是关注治疗臂依赖性和随机干预后 MRD 的结果分析。在 B 细胞前体 (BCP)-ALL 中,与阿糖胞苷相比,克拉屈滨更能彻底消除 MRD,每组 143 名随机患者中有 93 名达到 MRD 阴性(c2 检验 P=0.03,左侧 P[Fisher 确切检验]=0.04)。随机干预后 BCP-ALL 的 MRD 状态保持其预后相关性,对无事件生存 (EFS) 和复发率有显著影响。然而,在随机疗程中未观察到 EFS 和总生存 (OS) 之间的结果差异(5 年 EFS:克拉屈滨 85.7%,SE=4.1% vs. HIDAC 84.8%,SE=4.7%[P=0.96];OS:95.7%,SE=1.9% vs. 92.2%,SE=3.2%[P=0.59]),与协变量或总体风险分层无关。随机和后续治疗元素之间的严重毒性也没有显著差异。总之,克拉屈滨/PEG-ASP 是有效且安全的,但与 HIDAC 相比,克拉屈滨的细胞毒性更强并没有转化为改善的结果,这表明在试验水平而非患者水平上,干预后 MRD 没有替代作用,这阻碍了该方案在 ALL 一线治疗中的更广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/9052901/e3170a4d5857/1071026.fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验