Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex Trust, Rochester City Airport, Maidstone Road, Kent, ME5 9SD, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 4;29(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00929-8.
Although the merit of pre-hospital critical care teams such as Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has been universally recognized for patients with penetrating torso injuries who present with unstable physiology, the potential merit in patients initially presenting with stable physiology is largely undetermined. The ability to predict the required pre-hospital interventions patients may have important implications for HEMS tasking, especially when transport times to definitive care are prolonged.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who sustained a penetrating torso injury and were attended by the Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex (AAKSS) over a 6-year period. Primary outcome was defined as the percentage of patients with penetrating torso injuries requiring HEMS-specific interventions anytime between HEMS arrival and arrival at hospital. Secondary outcomes were the association of individual patient- and injury characteristics with the requirement for HEMS interventions.
During the study period 363 patients met inclusion criteria. 90% of patients were male with a median age of 30 years. 99% of penetrating trauma incident occurred more than 10-min drive from a Major Trauma Centre (MTC). Presenting GCS was > 13 in 83% of patients. Significant hemodynamic- or ventilatory compromise was present in more than 25% of the patients. Traumatic cardiac arrest was present in 34 patients (9.4%), profound hypotension with SBP < 80 mmHg in 30 (8.3%) and oxygen saturations < 92% in 30 (8.3%). A total of 121 HEMS-specific interventions were performed. Although HEMS-specific interventions were associated with presenting physiology (TCA OR 1.75 [1.41-2.16], SBP < 80 mmHg (OR 1.40 [1.18-1.67] and SpO < 92% (OR 1.39 [1.17-1.65], a minority of the patients presented initially with stable physiology but deteriorated on route to hospital and required HEMS interventions (n = 9, 3.3%).
HEMS teams provide potentially important contribution to the pre-hospital treatment of patients with penetrating torso injuries in rural and semi-rural areas, especially when they present with unstable physiology. A certain degree of over-triage is inevitable in these patients, as it is hard to predict which patients will deteriorate on route to hospital and will need HEMS interventions. The results of this study showing a potentially predictable geographical dispersion of penetrating trauma could inform multi-agency knife crime prevention strategy.
直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)等院前急救团队对于出现不稳定生理状态的穿透性胸腹部损伤患者具有明显优势,然而其对于初始生理状态稳定的患者的潜在优势仍未明确。预测患者可能需要的院前干预措施对于 HEMS 任务分配具有重要意义,尤其是在转送至确定性治疗的时间延长的情况下。
我们对在过去 6 年内接受肯特郡、萨塞克斯郡和苏塞克斯郡空中救护队(AAKSS)救治的穿透性胸腹部损伤患者进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结局定义为 HEMS 到达和到达医院之间任何时间需要 HEMS 特定干预的穿透性胸腹部损伤患者的百分比。次要结局为个体患者和损伤特征与 HEMS 干预需求的关联。
在研究期间,符合纳入标准的患者共 363 例。90%的患者为男性,中位年龄为 30 岁。99%的穿透性创伤事件发生在距离大型创伤中心(MTC)超过 10 分钟车程的地方。83%的患者入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)>13。超过 25%的患者存在显著的血流动力学或通气障碍。34 例(9.4%)患者出现创伤性心搏骤停,30 例(8.3%)患者存在严重低血压(收缩压<80mmHg),30 例(8.3%)患者的氧饱和度<92%。共进行了 121 次 HEMS 特定干预。尽管 HEMS 特定干预与入院时的生理状态相关(心搏骤停的比值比(OR)为 1.75[1.41-2.16],收缩压<80mmHg(OR 为 1.40[1.18-1.67]和 SpO<92%(OR 为 1.39[1.17-1.65]),但少数患者最初表现为稳定的生理状态,但在转送至医院的途中恶化,需要 HEMS 干预(n=9,3.3%)。
HEMS 团队为农村和半农村地区穿透性胸腹部损伤患者的院前治疗提供了潜在的重要贡献,尤其是当患者出现不稳定的生理状态时。这些患者不可避免地存在一定程度的过度分诊,因为很难预测哪些患者会在转送至医院的途中恶化并需要 HEMS 干预。本研究结果显示穿透性创伤可能具有可预测的地理分布,这可以为多机构的刀具犯罪预防策略提供信息。