Padilla Lace, Dryhurst Sarah, Hosseinpour Helia, Kruczkiewicz Andrew
Spatial Perception, Applied Cognition and Education (SPACE) Lab, Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States.
Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 19;12:579207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579207. eCollection 2021.
Making decisions with uncertainty is challenging for the general public, policymakers, and even highly trained scientists. Nevertheless, when faced with the need to respond to a potential hazard, people must make high-risk decisions with uncertainty. In some cases, people have to consider multiple hazards with various types of uncertainties. Multiple hazards can be interconnected by location, time, and/or environmental systems, and the hazards may interact, producing complex relationships among their associated uncertainties. The interaction between multiple hazards and their uncertainties can have nonlinear effects, where the resultant risk and uncertainty are greater than the sum of the risk and uncertainty associated with individual hazards. Effectively communicating the uncertainties related to such complicated systems should be a high priority because the frequency and variability of multiple hazard events due to climate change continue to increase. However, the communication of multiple hazard uncertainties and their interactions remains largely unexplored. The lack of practical guidance on conveying multiple hazard uncertainties is likely due in part to the field's vast expanse, making it challenging to identify entry points. Here, we offer a perspective on three critical challenges related to uncertainty communication across various multiple hazard contexts to galvanize the research community. We advocate for systematic considerations of multiple hazard uncertainty communication that focus on trade-offs between complexity and factors, including mental effort, trust, and usability.
对于普通大众、政策制定者乃至训练有素的科学家而言,在存在不确定性的情况下做出决策都颇具挑战性。然而,面对应对潜在危害的需求时,人们必须在存在不确定性的情况下做出高风险决策。在某些情况下,人们不得不考虑多种具有不同类型不确定性的危害。多种危害可能通过位置、时间和/或环境系统相互关联,而且这些危害可能相互作用,在其相关的不确定性之间产生复杂的关系。多种危害及其不确定性之间的相互作用可能产生非线性效应,即由此产生的风险和不确定性大于与单个危害相关的风险和不确定性之和。有效传达与这类复杂系统相关的不确定性应成为高度优先事项,因为气候变化导致的多种危害事件的频率和变异性持续增加。然而,多种危害不确定性及其相互作用的沟通在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在传达多种危害不确定性方面缺乏实用指导,部分原因可能在于该领域范围广阔,难以确定切入点。在此,我们针对跨多种危害情境的不确定性沟通所涉及的三个关键挑战提出一种观点,以激励研究界。我们主张对多种危害不确定性沟通进行系统考量,重点关注复杂性与包括心理努力、信任和可用性在内的因素之间的权衡。