• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兔离体窦房结标本对三环和四环抗抑郁药变时反应的比较。

Comparison of the chronotropic responses to tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants in isolated sinoatrial node preparations from the rabbit.

作者信息

Kotake H, Hirai S, Matsuoka S, Kinugawa T, Hasegawa J, Mashiba H

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.

出版信息

Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1987 Sep;289(1):72-81.

PMID:3435207
Abstract

The effects of maprotiline and mianserin, tetracyclic antidepressant agents, on membrane potentials and currents of rabbit sinoatrial node cells were studied and compared to those of a tricyclic antidepressant compound, imipramine. Imipramine (10 microM), maprotiline (30 microM) and mianserin (100 microM) significantly decreased the spontaneous rate, the maximum rate of rise and the action potential amplitude. The slope of the diastolic depolarization was also decelerated by these drugs. On the current systems, imipramine (10 microM), maprotiline (10-30 microM) and mianserin (40-100 microM) decreased the slow inward current, the time-dependent potassium outward current and the hyperpolarization-activated inward current. Although all these antidepressant agents have qualitatively similar depressant effects, the inhibitory potency on the electrical activity of sinoatrial node was: imipramine greater than maprotiline greater than mianserin. These electrophysiological observations suggest that tetracyclic antidepressant agents might have less pronounced cardiotoxicity than did tricyclic antidepressants in slow response fibers.

摘要

研究了四环类抗抑郁药马普替林和米安色林对兔窦房结细胞膜电位和电流的影响,并与三环类抗抑郁化合物丙咪嗪进行了比较。丙咪嗪(10微摩尔)、马普替林(30微摩尔)和米安色林(100微摩尔)显著降低了自发频率、最大上升速率和动作电位幅度。这些药物还使舒张期去极化斜率减慢。在电流系统方面,丙咪嗪(10微摩尔)、马普替林(10 - 30微摩尔)和米安色林(40 - 100微摩尔)降低了慢内向电流、时间依赖性钾外向电流和超极化激活内向电流。尽管所有这些抗抑郁药在性质上具有相似的抑制作用,但对窦房结电活动的抑制效力为:丙咪嗪大于马普替林大于米安色林。这些电生理观察结果表明,在慢反应纤维中,四环类抗抑郁药的心脏毒性可能比三环类抗抑郁药轻。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the chronotropic responses to tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants in isolated sinoatrial node preparations from the rabbit.兔离体窦房结标本对三环和四环抗抑郁药变时反应的比较。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1987 Sep;289(1):72-81.
2
Electrophysiological effects of maprotiline, a tetracyclic antidepressant agent, on isolated cardiac preparations.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988 Feb;11(2):167-73.
3
Electrophysiological study of cibenzoline in voltage-clamped rabbit sinoatrial node preparations.电压钳制兔窦房结标本中昔苯唑啉的电生理研究。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Jun;241(3):982-6.
4
Effects of tetracyclic antidepressant drugs on the electrophysiological properties of canine cardiac Purkinje fibres.四环类抗抑郁药对犬心脏浦肯野纤维电生理特性的影响。
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Sep;4(6):281-6.
5
Inhibition of 22Na influx by tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants and binding of [3H]imipramine in bovine adrenal medullary cells.三环和四环抗抑郁药对牛肾上腺髓质细胞中22Na内流的抑制作用及[3H]丙咪嗪的结合
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Oct;243(1):342-8.
6
Effect of bepridil on membrane currents of rabbit sinoatrial node cells.苄普地尔对家兔窦房结细胞膜电流的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1987 Apr;37(4):424-7.
7
Effects of guanabenz acetate on the pacemaker activity of rabbit sinoatrial node cells.醋酸胍那苄对兔窦房结细胞起搏活性的影响。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1989 Jul-Aug;300:209-17.
8
Electrophysiological effect of trapidil on rabbit sinoatrial node cells.
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1986 Jan;279(1):61-71.
9
Imipramine, mianserine and maprotiline block delayed rectifier potassium current in ventricular myocytes.丙咪嗪、米安色林和马普替林可阻断心室肌细胞中的延迟整流钾电流。
Pharmacol Res. 2002 Feb;45(2):141-6. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2002.0941.
10
Effect of the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist urapidil on the pacemaker activity of rabbit sino-atrial node preparations.α-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂乌拉地尔对家兔窦房结标本起搏活性的影响。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1988 Jul-Aug;294:149-58.