Comparison of the Effects of Matching and Normalization on the Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential.

HYPOTHESIS

We compared two means of mitigating the effect of sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction strength on the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP): contraction matching and amplitude normalization.

BACKGROUND

SCM muscle contraction strength affects the amplitude of the cVEMP which can impact measures of inter-side asymmetry and diagnostic outcomes.

METHODS

In 19 normal subjects, we investigated the effect of muscle contraction variation within a cVEMP recording. We then compared cVEMP recordings on the right and left sides with matched and unmatched muscle contraction strength using raw amplitudes and amplitude ratios (i.e., normalized amplitudes).

RESULTS

Contraction variability had significant effects on small sections of a cVEMP recording, but there was no significant effect on overall cVEMP amplitude, suggesting that the cVEMP is relatively unaffected by variable effort during a recording. Matching the contraction across the two sides (d = 0.53, p = 0.016) and amplitude normalization (d = 0.43, p = 0.004) both significantly reduced inter-side asymmetry, but normalization had no additional benefit once the sides were matched (interaction effect, p = 0.019). cVEMPs recorded with matched contractions had the smallest range of asymmetry values.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that controlling the background contraction during a cVEMP recording, either by using similar contractions for each trial or by normalizing the amplitude, reduces cVEMP asymmetry and can prevent incorrect results in the minority of subjects who make asymmetric muscle contractions.