Suppr超能文献

量化电极放置和导联方式对颈肌前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)振幅测量及肌肉收缩的影响。

Quantifying the effects of electrode placement and montage on measures of cVEMP amplitude and muscle contraction.

作者信息

Govender Sendhil, Rosengren Sally M

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Vestib Res. 2021;31(1):47-59. doi: 10.3233/VES-200033.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) can be affected by the recording parameters used to quantify the response.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of electrode placement and montage on the variability and symmetry of sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction strength and cVEMP amplitude.

METHODS

We used inter-side asymmetries in electrode placement to mimic small clinical errors in twenty normal subjects. cVEMPs were recorded at three active electrode sites and referred to the distal SCM tendon (referential montages: upper, conventional and lower). Additional bipolar montages were constructed offline to measure SCM contraction strength using closely-spaced electrode pairs (bipolar montages: superior, lower and outer).

RESULTS

The conventional montage generally produced the largest cVEMP amplitudes (P < 0.001). SCM contraction strength was larger for referential montages than bipolar ones (P < 0.001). Inter-side electrode position errors produced large variations in cVEMP and SCM contraction strength asymmetries in some subjects, producing erroneous abnormal test results.

CONCLUSION

Recording locations affect cVEMP amplitude and SCM contraction strength. In most cases, small changes in electrode position had only minor effects but, in a minority of subjects, the different montages produced large changes in cVEMP and contraction amplitudes and asymmetry, potentially affecting test outcomes.

摘要

背景

颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)会受到用于量化反应的记录参数的影响。

目的

我们研究了电极放置和导联方式对胸锁乳突肌(SCM)收缩强度及cVEMP波幅的变异性和对称性的影响。

方法

我们利用20名正常受试者电极放置的双侧不对称来模拟小的临床误差。在三个有源电极部位记录cVEMP,并参考SCM肌腱远端(参考导联方式:上部、传统和下部)。离线构建额外的双极导联方式,使用间距很近的电极对测量SCM收缩强度(双极导联方式:上部、下部和外侧)。

结果

传统导联方式通常产生最大的cVEMP波幅(P<0.001)。参考导联方式下的SCM收缩强度大于双极导联方式(P<0.001)。双侧电极位置误差在一些受试者中导致cVEMP和SCM收缩强度不对称出现很大变化,产生错误的异常测试结果。

结论

记录位置会影响cVEMP波幅和SCM收缩强度。在大多数情况下,电极位置的微小变化仅有轻微影响,但在少数受试者中,不同的导联方式会使cVEMP和收缩波幅及不对称性产生很大变化,可能影响测试结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验