Kwadzo Moses, Quayson Emmanuel
Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Cape Coast, Sasakwa Center, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Department of Agricultural Science, Aggrey Memorial Zion Senior High School, Accra-Cape Coast Highway, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Heliyon. 2021 Jul 16;7(7):e07589. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07589. eCollection 2021 Jul.
This study examines smallholder farmers' adoption of both a full set of and multiple bundles of integrated soil fertility management technologies, and estimates the determinants of and assesses the relationship among adoption practices using the logistic model and multivariate probit model respectively. A cross-sectional survey was used to collect data from 300 smallholder farmers who benefitted from a sustainable food security and environmental health project in three districts in Ghana. Four ISFM technologies (zero or minimal tillage, inorganic fertilizer, leguminous crop, and crop rotation serve as outcome variables. The result revealed that only 26.7% of the respondents adopted the full set of the ISFM technologies. Agroecological zone, a spatial variable has been found to significantly influence smallholder farmers adoption of the full ISFM technologies. One or more of the predictor variables, purpose of farming, land ownership, distance from house to the nearest input shop, access credit and agroecological zone, have been found to significantly influence the adoption of the multiple ISFM technologies. However, the computed correlation coefficients of the independent determinants show inconsistent significant values. The implication of this finding is that the adoption of multiple ISFM technologies cannot be estimated utilizing common determinants. Therefore, extension service in the region should focus on crucial factors that influence adoption of specific multiple ISFM technologies to maximize adoption options.
本研究考察了小农户对全套和多组综合土壤肥力管理技术的采用情况,并分别使用逻辑模型和多元概率单位模型估计采用行为的决定因素并评估采用行为之间的关系。采用横断面调查从加纳三个地区300名受益于可持续粮食安全和环境卫生项目的小农户收集数据。四种综合土壤肥力管理技术(免耕或少耕、无机肥料、豆科作物和作物轮作)作为结果变量。结果显示,只有26.7%的受访者采用了全套综合土壤肥力管理技术。已发现农业生态区这一空间变量对小农户采用全套综合土壤肥力管理技术有显著影响。已发现一个或多个预测变量,即耕作目的、土地所有权、房屋到最近投入品商店的距离、获得信贷情况和农业生态区,对采用多组综合土壤肥力管理技术有显著影响。然而,独立决定因素的计算相关系数显示出不一致的显著值。这一发现的含义是,无法利用共同的决定因素来估计采用多组综合土壤肥力管理技术的情况。因此,该地区的推广服务应侧重于影响采用特定多组综合土壤肥力管理技术的关键因素,以最大限度地增加采用选择。