• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝门部胆管癌的大范围肝切除术联合血管切除。

Major hepatectomy with combined vascular resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 Jul 6;5(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab064.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrab064
PMID:34355240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8342931/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy with vascular resection (VR) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is a challenging procedure. However, only a few reports on this procedure have been published and its clinical significance has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical resection for PHCC from 2002-2017 were studied. The surgical outcomes of VR and non-VR groups were compared.

RESULTS

Some 238 patients were included. VR was performed in 85 patients. The resected vessels were hepatic artery alone (31 patients), portal vein alone (37 patients) or both (17 patients). The morbidity rates were almost the same in the VR (49.4 per cent) and non-VR (43.8 per cent) groups (P = 0.404). The mortality rates of VR (3.5 per cent) and non-VR (3.3 per cent) were also comparable (P > 0.999). The median survival time (MST) was 45 months in the non-VR group and 36 months in VR group (P = 0.124). Among patients in whom tumour involvement was suspected on preoperative imaging and whose carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) value was 37 U/ml or less, MST in the VR group was significantly longer than that in the non-VR group (50 versus 34 months, P = 0.017). In contrast, when the CA19-9 value was greater than 37 U/ml, MST of the VR and non-VR groups was comparable (28 versus 29 months, P = 0.520).

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy with VR for PHCC can be performed in a highly specialized hepatobiliary centre with equivalent short- and long-term outcomes to hepatectomy without VR.

摘要

背景

肝切除术联合血管切除术(VR)治疗肝门部胆管癌(PHCC)是一项具有挑战性的手术。然而,仅有少数关于该手术的报道,其临床意义尚未得到充分评估。

方法

研究了 2002 年至 2017 年期间接受手术切除 PHCC 的患者。比较了 VR 组和非 VR 组的手术结果。

结果

共纳入 238 例患者,其中 85 例行 VR。切除的血管仅为肝动脉(31 例)、门静脉(37 例)或两者均有(17 例)。VR 组(49.4%)和非 VR 组(43.8%)的发病率几乎相同(P=0.404)。VR 组(3.5%)和非 VR 组(3.3%)的死亡率也相似(P>0.999)。非 VR 组的中位生存时间(MST)为 45 个月,VR 组为 36 个月(P=0.124)。在术前影像学怀疑肿瘤累及且癌抗原 19-9(CA19-9)值为 37U/ml 或更低的患者中,VR 组的 MST 明显长于非 VR 组(50 与 34 个月,P=0.017)。相反,当 CA19-9 值大于 37U/ml 时,VR 组和非 VR 组的 MST 无差异(28 与 29 个月,P=0.520)。

结论

在高度专业化的肝胆中心,肝切除术联合 VR 治疗 PHCC 可获得与无 VR 肝切除术相当的短期和长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/0442264ebf82/zrab064f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/f3a738f40062/zrab064f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/044cfd7d908c/zrab064f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/3cbbe042933a/zrab064f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/0442264ebf82/zrab064f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/f3a738f40062/zrab064f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/044cfd7d908c/zrab064f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/3cbbe042933a/zrab064f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c898/8342931/0442264ebf82/zrab064f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Major hepatectomy with combined vascular resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌的大范围肝切除术联合血管切除。
BJS Open. 2021 Jul 6;5(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab064.
2
Impact of Combined Vascular Resection and Reconstruction in Patients with Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.联合血管切除与重建术在肝门周围胆管癌患者中的应用效果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3108-3118. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05004-2. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Combined Vascular Resection for Locally Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.联合血管切除治疗局部进展期肝门部胆管癌
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):382-390. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004322.
4
Outcomes of vascular resection associated with curative intent hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.血管切除联合根治性肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的疗效。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;46(9):1727-1733. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
5
Transhepatic Direct Approach to the "Limit of the Division of the Hepatic Ducts" Leads to a High R0 Resection Rate in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.经肝直接入路至“肝管分叉极限”可使肝门部胆管癌获得较高的R0切除率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep;25(9):2358-2367. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04891-1. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
Surgical technique of hepatectomy combined with simultaneous resection of hepatic artery and portal vein for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (with video).肝门部胆管癌肝切除术联合肝动脉及门静脉同期切除的手术技术(附视频)
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Aug;21(8):E57-61. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.121. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
7
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure for cholangiocarcinoma.联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分阶段肝切除术(ALPPS)治疗胆管癌。
Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82S:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.045. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Multivariable prediction model for both 90-day mortality and long-term survival for individual patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: does the predicted survival justify the surgical risk?针对肝门部胆管癌患者的 90 天死亡率和长期生存的多变量预测模型:预测的生存情况是否 justifies 手术风险?
Br J Surg. 2023 Apr 12;110(5):599-605. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad057.
9
Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases.肝切除术联合门静脉和肝动脉切除治疗高位肝门部胆管癌:50 例连续病例的回顾性分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):115-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e463a7.
10
Role of major vascular resection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管细胞癌患者中主要血管切除的作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(6):2023-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2808-2. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's perspective.肝门部胆管癌:外科医生的视角
ILIVER. 2022 Apr 5;1(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术切除肝门部胆管癌的短期和长期预后:一项基于倾向评分的分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Apr 1;14(2):207-221. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-680. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Extended Hepatectomy on Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined Vascular Resection for Locally Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.联合血管切除治疗局部进展期肝门部胆管癌
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):382-390. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004322.
2
Actual 5-Year Survivors After Surgical Resection of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌手术切除后的实际 5 年生存率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):611-618. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7075-4. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
Left Hepatectomy with Combined Resection and Reconstruction of Right Hepatic Artery for Bismuth Type I and II Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
糖尿病和扩大肝切除术对肝门部胆管癌的预后影响
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Feb 25;6(1):e552. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000552. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Short- and Long-term Surgical Results of Extended Surgery for Widespread Gallbladder Carcinoma.广泛性胆囊癌扩大手术的短期和长期手术结果
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1022-1032. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13907.
5
Time to Surgery Does Not Affect the Survival Outcome in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.手术时机不影响肝门部胆管癌患者的生存结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1808-1816. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16628-4. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
6
Portal vein wedge resection and patch venoplasty with autologous vein grafts for hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer.门静脉楔形切除及自体静脉移植补片血管成形术治疗肝胆胰肿瘤
Surg Case Rep. 2024 Jan 26;10(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-01823-y.
7
Comparative study on left-sided versus right-sided hepatectomy for resectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左半肝切除术与右半肝切除术治疗可切除肝门周围胆管癌的对比研究:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 18;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03037-2.
8
Liver transplantation in the management of cholangiocarcinoma: Evolution and contemporary advances.肝移植在胆管癌治疗中的应用:演变与当代进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 7;29(13):1969-1981. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i13.1969.
9
Vascular resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma.远端胆管癌的血管切除术。
Surg Today. 2023 Aug;53(8):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02634-0. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
10
Preoperative risk factors for early recurrence after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门周围胆管癌切除术后早期复发的术前危险因素。
BJS Open. 2022 Sep 2;6(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac115.
左半肝切除术联合右肝动脉切除与重建治疗Bismuth I型和II型肝门部胆管癌
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4833-1.
4
Surgical Outcomes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Vascular Invasion.肝门部胆管癌伴血管侵犯的手术治疗结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1443-1453. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3948-x. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Robust inference for responder analysis: Innovative clinical trial design using a minimum p-value approach.反应者分析的稳健推断:采用最小p值方法的创新型临床试验设计
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Apr 14;3:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.001. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
6
Hepatic Artery Resection for Bismuth Type III and IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Reconstruction Always Required?肝动脉切除治疗 Bismuth Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌:是否总是需要重建?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jul;22(7):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3711-3. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer.随机对照临床试验:辅助吉西他滨化疗对比观察用于胆管癌根治术后。
Br J Surg. 2018 Feb;105(3):192-202. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10776.
8
CA 19-9 as a Marker of Survival and a Predictor of Metastization in Cholangiocarcinoma.CA 19-9作为胆管癌生存标志物及转移预测指标
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;24(3):114-121. doi: 10.1159/000452691. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Can preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 levels predict survival and early recurrence in patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma?术前和术后CA19-9水平能否预测可切除肝门部胆管癌患者的生存及早期复发情况?
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):45335-45344. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17336.
10
Safety-related outcomes of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery board certification system for expert surgeons.日本肝胆胰外科学会专家外科医师认证制度的安全性相关结果。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 May;24(5):252-261. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.444. Epub 2017 Apr 26.