Nitsch Felix Jan, Strenger Hannah, Knecht Stefan, Studer Bettina
Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mauritius Hospital Meerbusch, Meerbusch, Germany.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 6;17(3):266-72. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab098.
Humans resist unequal distributions of goods in their social interactions, even if it requires foregoing personal gains. Functional neuroimaging studies implicate the insula in this aversion to social inequity and in fairness-related decisions, but a causal contribution has not yet been established. We compared the responses of 30 patients with lesions to the insula on a multiple-trial version of the one-shot Ultimatum Game, a neuroeconomic social exchange paradigm where a sum of money is split between two players, to those of 30 matched patients with brain injuries sparing the insula. Insula lesion patients accepted offers of an unequal disadvantageous split significantly more often than comparison lesion patients. Computational modeling confirmed that this difference in choice behavior was due to decreased aversion to disadvantageous inequity following insula damage, rather than due to increased decision noise or non-consideration of inequity. Our results provide novel evidence that the insula is causally involved in aversion to inequity and in value-based choices in the context of social interactions.
人类在社交互动中会抵制不平等的资源分配,即使这意味着要放弃个人利益。功能性神经影像学研究表明,脑岛参与了对社会不平等的厌恶以及与公平相关的决策,但尚未确定其因果关系。我们在单次最后通牒博弈的多轮版本中比较了30名脑岛受损患者的反应,这是一种神经经济学社会交换范式,一笔钱在两名玩家之间分配,同时也比较了30名匹配的脑损伤但脑岛未受损患者的反应。与对照组脑损伤患者相比,脑岛损伤患者显著更频繁地接受不平等的不利分配。计算模型证实,这种选择行为的差异是由于脑岛损伤后对不利不平等的厌恶减少,而不是由于决策噪声增加或不考虑不平等。我们的研究结果提供了新的证据,表明脑岛在社交互动中因果性地参与了对不平等的厌恶以及基于价值的选择。