Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征患者中生物可吸收聚合物与持久性聚合物药物洗脱支架植入 6 个月后血管愈合反应的比较:一项随机系列光学相干断层扫描研究。

Comparison of 6-month vascular healing response after bioresorbable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A randomized serial optical coherence tomography study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):E677-E686. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29892. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare vascular healing between bioresorbable polymer (BP) and durable polymer (DP) everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

BACKGROUND

Whether BP-EES induce better vascular healing compared to contemporary DP-EES remains controversial, especially for ACS.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial, we used OCT to compare 6-month vascular healing in patients with ACS randomized to BP versus DP-EES: percent strut coverage (primary endpoint, non-inferiority margin of 2.0%) and neointimal thickness and percent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) volume. As an exploratory analysis, morphological factors related to the endpoints and the effect of underlying lipidic plaque on stent healing were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with ACS were randomly assigned to BP-EES (n = 52) versus DP-EES (n = 52). Of these, 86 patients (40 BP-EES and 46 DP-EES) were included in the final OCT analyses. Six-month percent strut coverage of BP-EES (83.6 ± 11.4%) was not non-inferior compared to those of DP-EES (81.6 ± 13.9%), difference 2.0% (lower 95% confidence interval-2.6%), p  = 0.07. There were no differences in neointimal thickness 70.0 ± 33.9 μm versus 67.2 ± 33.9 μm, p = 0.71; and percent NIH volume 7.5 ± 4.7% versus 7.3 ± 5.3%, p = 0.85. By multivariable linear regression analysis, stent type was not associated with percent strut coverage or percent NIH volume; however, percent baseline embedded struts or stent expansion was positively associated with percent NIH volume. Greater NIH volume was observed in lipidic compared with non-lipidic segments (8.7 ± 5.6% vs. 6.1 ± 5.2%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Six-month strut coverage of BP-EES was not non-inferior compared to those of DP-EES in ACS patients. Good stent apposition and expansion were independently associated with better vascular healing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)比较急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中生物可吸收聚合物(BP)和耐用聚合物(DP)载依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)的血管愈合情况。

背景

BP-EES 是否比当代 DP-EES 诱导更好的血管愈合仍存在争议,尤其是在 ACS 患者中。

方法

在这项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性试验中,我们使用 OCT 比较了 ACS 患者随机分为 BP-EES 与 DP-EES 的 6 个月血管愈合情况:支架覆盖率(主要终点,非劣效性边界为 2.0%)和新生内膜厚度和新生内膜增生(NIH)体积。作为探索性分析,评估了与终点相关的形态学因素以及潜在脂质斑块对支架愈合的影响。

结果

共有 104 例 ACS 患者被随机分为 BP-EES(n=52)与 DP-EES(n=52)。其中,86 例患者(BP-EES 40 例,DP-EES 46 例)纳入最终的 OCT 分析。BP-EES 的 6 个月支架覆盖率(83.6±11.4%)与 DP-EES 的 81.6±13.9%相比不具有非劣效性,差异为 2.0%(下 95%置信区间为-2.6%),p=0.07。新生内膜厚度 70.0±33.9μm与 67.2±33.9μm相比无差异,p=0.71;新生内膜增生体积 7.5±4.7%与 7.3±5.3%相比无差异,p=0.85。通过多变量线性回归分析,支架类型与支架覆盖率或 NIH 体积百分比无关;然而,支架基线嵌入支架或支架扩张百分比与 NIH 体积百分比呈正相关。脂质斑块段比非脂质斑块段 NIH 体积更大(8.7±5.6%比 6.1±5.2%,p=0.005)。

结论

ACS 患者中,BP-EES 的 6 个月支架覆盖率与 DP-EES 相比不具有非劣效性。良好的支架贴壁和扩张与更好的血管愈合独立相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f6f/9292175/9f83546293e2/CCD-98-E677-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验