Young J L, Mills M J, Sack R L
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(2):127-39.
This article summarizes the conservatorship provisions of the California Civil Commitment Statute, the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act and reviews the major findings from previous studies. By studying the hospital records of eighty-five gravely disabled patients affected by LPS, the authors address issues raised by these reports. The results indicate that the law's provisions work unevenly. Patients with acute and current disability received conservatorships more frequently than those who had been disabled in the past. There is some evidence that the process is used to confine threatening patients and does not function equally well for all diagnostic groups.
本文总结了《加利福尼亚民事监护法规》(即《兰特曼-佩特里斯-肖特法案》,简称LPS法案)中的监护条款,并回顾了以往研究的主要发现。通过研究85名受LPS影响的严重残疾患者的医院记录,作者探讨了这些报告中提出的问题。结果表明,该法律条款的实施效果参差不齐。急性和当前残疾患者比过去残疾的患者更频繁地受到监护。有证据表明,这一程序被用于关押具有威胁性的患者,并且对所有诊断组的作用并不相同。