Lawler J, Powers S K, Dodd S
Applied Physiology Laboratory, School of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803.
Br J Sports Med. 1987 Dec;21(4):171-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.21.4.171.
Previously we have demonstrated that an accelerated arm ergometry testing protocol results in a higher peak oxygen consumption than continuous or discontinuous protocols reported in the literature (Brit. J. Sports Med. 20: 25-26, 1986). The purpose of this investigation was to determine if an accelerated protocol was superior to two commonly used protocols in cycle ergometry. Nine male subjects were tested on three different exercise protocols; a discontinuous test (DT), a continuous test (CT) and a new proposed "jump-max test" (JMT). The CT began at a work rate of 70 W with the power output (PO) being increased 35 W.min-1. The DT began at a work rate of 70 W; the work rate was increased by 35 W every 2 minutes with 2-minutes rest between stages. The JMT began with a 3-minute pretest to determine a PO which elicited a HR of 145 +/- 5 bpm. After a 2-minute rest, subjects began exercise at the predetermined work rate with the PO being increased 35 W.min-1. Testing sessions were terminated when subjects failed to maintain the desired PO. No significant difference (p greater than 0.05) existed in peak PO or peak oxygen consumption (VO2) between the three protocols. However, JMT protocol did result in a shorter time to exhaustion than the other protocols employed (P less than 0.05).
此前我们已经证明,与文献报道的连续或间断方案相比,加速手臂测力计测试方案能产生更高的峰值耗氧量(《英国运动医学杂志》20: 25 - 26, 1986)。本研究的目的是确定加速方案在自行车测力计测试中是否优于两种常用方案。九名男性受试者接受了三种不同运动方案的测试:间断测试(DT)、连续测试(CT)和新提出的“最大跳跃测试”(JMT)。CT从70瓦的工作负荷开始,功率输出(PO)以每分钟35瓦的速度增加。DT从70瓦的工作负荷开始;工作负荷每2分钟增加35瓦,各阶段之间休息2分钟。JMT首先进行3分钟的预测试,以确定能使心率达到145±5次/分钟的PO。休息2分钟后,受试者以预定的工作负荷开始运动,PO以每分钟35瓦的速度增加。当受试者无法维持所需的PO时,测试结束。三种方案在峰值PO或峰值耗氧量(VO2)方面不存在显著差异(p大于0.05)。然而,JMT方案导致的疲劳时间比其他采用的方案更短(P小于0.05)。