Kronenfeld Joshua P, Crystal Jessica S, Ryon Emily L, Yadegarynia Sina, Chitters Celeste, Yechieli Raphael, D'Amato Gina, Rosenberg Andrew E, Kesmodel Susan B, Trent Jonathan C, Goel Neha
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33132, USA.
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33132, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;13(15):3814. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153814.
The optimal management of primary angiosarcoma (PAS) and radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast remains undefined. Available data show persistently poor survival outcomes following treatment with surgery or chemotherapy alone. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients treated with multimodality therapy.
Patients diagnosed with stage I-III PAS or RAAS of the breast were identified from our local tumor registry (2010-2020). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were collected. Primary outcomes were local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), and median overall survival (OS). A secondary outcome was pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared, or Fisher exact tests were used to analyze data. Kaplan-Meier curves compared OS for PAS and RAAS.
Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria, including 11 (50%) with RAAS and 11 (50%) with PAS. Compared to PAS patients, RAAS patients were older and had more comorbidities. For RAAS patients, median time from radiation to diagnosis was 6 years (IQR: 5-11). RAAS patients were more likely to have a pCR to NAC (40% vs. 20%, = 0.72). RAAS patients had a higher LR rate (43% vs. 38%, = 0.83), and PAS patients were more likely to develop a DR (38% vs. 0%, = 0.07). Median OS was 81 months in PAS patients and 90 months in RAAS patients ( = 1.00).
Long-term survival can be achieved in patients with PAS and RAAS who undergo multimodality treatment. NAC can result in pCR. The long-term clinical implications of pCR warrant further investigation.
乳腺原发性血管肉瘤(PAS)和放疗相关血管肉瘤(RAAS)的最佳治疗方案仍不明确。现有数据表明,单独采用手术或化疗治疗后,患者的生存结局持续较差。本研究的目的是评估接受多模式治疗患者的长期结局。
从我们当地的肿瘤登记处(2010 - 2020年)中识别出诊断为I - III期乳腺PAS或RAAS的患者。收集患者的人口统计学资料、肿瘤特征和治疗情况。主要结局为局部复发(LR)、远处复发(DR)和中位总生存期(OS)。次要结局为新辅助化疗(NAC)后的病理完全缓解(pCR)。采用曼 - 惠特尼U检验、卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验分析数据。Kaplan - Meier曲线比较了PAS和RAAS的OS。
22例患者符合纳入标准,其中11例(50%)为RAAS,11例(50%)为PAS。与PAS患者相比,RAAS患者年龄更大,合并症更多。对于RAAS患者,从放疗到诊断的中位时间为6年(四分位间距:5 - 11年)。RAAS患者对NAC达到pCR的可能性更高(40%对20%,P = 0.72)。RAAS患者的LR率更高(43%对38%,P = 0.83),PAS患者更易发生DR(38%对0%,P = 0.07)。PAS患者的中位OS为81个月,RAAS患者为90个月(P = 1.00)。
接受多模式治疗的PAS和RAAS患者可实现长期生存。NAC可导致pCR。pCR的长期临床意义值得进一步研究。