Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Apr;41(4):928-939. doi: 10.1177/07334648211036402. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
Elder abuse (EA) affects one in six older adults, and financial EA, a common subtype, severely impacts victims and society. Understanding victim vulnerability and perpetrator risk factors is essential to EA prevention and management. The limited existing evidence about these factors in relation to EA types suggests that financial EA is different. In a cross-sectional quantitative analysis of secondary data ( = 1,238), we investigated EA vulnerability and risk factors, and victim-perpetrator family relationship, with respect to different EA types (financial only, financial co-occurring with other types, and nonfinancial abuse). Financial abuse-only cases had the lowest prevalence of vulnerability and risk factors. Most of these factors, and a familial relationship, were significantly more common in cases involving other EA types. Findings indicate that financial abuse, occurring in isolation, is distinct from other EA types. Risk assessment and future research should consider financial abuse separately to other EA forms.
虐待老人(Elder abuse, EA)影响每六名老年人中的一人,而常见的亚型——财务虐待(Financial elder abuse, FEA),则严重影响受害者和社会。了解受害者的脆弱性和施害者的风险因素对于 EA 的预防和管理至关重要。关于这些因素与 EA 类型的关系的现有证据有限,这表明 FEA 有所不同。在对二次数据(n = 1,238)进行的横断面定量分析中,我们研究了不同 EA 类型(仅财务虐待、财务虐待与其他类型同时发生以及非财务虐待)下的 EA 脆弱性和风险因素,以及受害者-施害者的家庭关系。仅财务虐待的情况下,脆弱性和风险因素的患病率最低。这些因素中的大多数,以及家庭关系,在涉及其他 EA 类型的情况下更为常见。研究结果表明,孤立发生的财务虐待与其他 EA 类型不同。风险评估和未来的研究应该将财务虐待与其他 EA 形式分开考虑。