Suppr超能文献

转甲状腺素蛋白心脏淀粉样变患者心房颤动和房扑的管理策略。

Management Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in Patients with Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis.

机构信息

Center for Amyloidosis, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Center for Amyloidosis, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 15;157:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.028. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) frequently complicate transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). Management poses challenges as rate control drugs are poorly tolerated and data addressing tolerability and efficacy of rhythm control is limited. We report outcomes of AF/AFL in ATTR-CM in a single center observational study of patients seen at our Amyloidosis Center with wild-type or hereditary ATTR-CM diagnosed between 2005-2019 including 84 patients (average age 74 ± 10 years, 94% male) with 27.6 ± 22.8 months follow-up. AF/AFL occurred in 61 patients (73%). Rapid ventricular response was common as was attempted rate control. However, discontinuation of rate control drugs was frequent (80%), often for adverse effects. Rhythm control was attempted in 64%, usually with cardioversion (DCCV) or ablation. Post-DCCV recurrence was common (91%) and time to recurrence was similar with or without anti-arrhythmic drugs (5.8 months (IQR 1.9-12.5) vs 6.2 months (IQR 1.9-12.5) p = 0.83). Ablation was performed in 23% with AFL (all for typical AFL) with 14% recurrence after mean of 60.9 months. Ablation for AF was performed in 12% with 86% recurrence after median of 6.2 months (IQR 5.6-12.3). Most patients (62%) with rhythm control had subjective improvement (≥1 NYHA class or resolved palpitations). In conclusion, AF/AFL was common in our cohort. Rate control was poorly tolerated and often abandoned. Rhythm control led to symptomatic improvement in a majority of cases, but durable success was limited. DCCV was modestly successful and not significantly improved with anti-arrhythmics. Ablation was successful with typical AFL but had limited success in AF.

摘要

心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)常并发于转甲状腺素蛋白心脏淀粉样变(ATTR-CM)。由于心率控制药物的耐受性差,且节律控制的疗效和耐受性数据有限,因此治疗具有挑战性。我们报告了在我们的淀粉样变中心观察性研究中,在 2005 年至 2019 年间诊断为野生型或遗传性ATTR-CM 的患者中,AF/AFL 的结局,包括 84 例患者(平均年龄 74 ± 10 岁,94%为男性),随访时间为 27.6 ± 22.8 个月。61 例患者(73%)发生 AF/AFL。快速心室反应很常见,尝试过心率控制。然而,经常停用心率控制药物(80%),通常是因为不良反应。尝试节律控制的患者占 64%,通常采用直流电复律(DCCV)或消融。DCCV 后复发很常见(91%),且有或无抗心律失常药物时的复发时间相似(5.8 个月(IQR 1.9-12.5)vs 6.2 个月(IQR 1.9-12.5),p = 0.83)。23%的 AFL 患者进行了消融(均为典型 AFL),平均 60.9 个月后有 14%的患者复发。12%的 AF 患者进行了消融,中位时间为 6.2 个月(IQR 5.6-12.3)后有 86%的患者复发。大多数(62%)有节律控制的患者主观改善(≥1 NYHA 分级或心悸消失)。结论,AF/AFL 在我们的队列中很常见。心率控制的耐受性差,且常被放弃。节律控制使大多数病例的症状得到改善,但持续成功有限。DCCV 略有疗效,且抗心律失常药物并无显著改善。DCCV 对典型 AFL 有效,但对 AF 的效果有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验