Center for Amyloidosis, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Center for Amyloidosis, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 15;157:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.028. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) frequently complicate transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). Management poses challenges as rate control drugs are poorly tolerated and data addressing tolerability and efficacy of rhythm control is limited. We report outcomes of AF/AFL in ATTR-CM in a single center observational study of patients seen at our Amyloidosis Center with wild-type or hereditary ATTR-CM diagnosed between 2005-2019 including 84 patients (average age 74 ± 10 years, 94% male) with 27.6 ± 22.8 months follow-up. AF/AFL occurred in 61 patients (73%). Rapid ventricular response was common as was attempted rate control. However, discontinuation of rate control drugs was frequent (80%), often for adverse effects. Rhythm control was attempted in 64%, usually with cardioversion (DCCV) or ablation. Post-DCCV recurrence was common (91%) and time to recurrence was similar with or without anti-arrhythmic drugs (5.8 months (IQR 1.9-12.5) vs 6.2 months (IQR 1.9-12.5) p = 0.83). Ablation was performed in 23% with AFL (all for typical AFL) with 14% recurrence after mean of 60.9 months. Ablation for AF was performed in 12% with 86% recurrence after median of 6.2 months (IQR 5.6-12.3). Most patients (62%) with rhythm control had subjective improvement (≥1 NYHA class or resolved palpitations). In conclusion, AF/AFL was common in our cohort. Rate control was poorly tolerated and often abandoned. Rhythm control led to symptomatic improvement in a majority of cases, but durable success was limited. DCCV was modestly successful and not significantly improved with anti-arrhythmics. Ablation was successful with typical AFL but had limited success in AF.
心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)常并发于转甲状腺素蛋白心脏淀粉样变(ATTR-CM)。由于心率控制药物的耐受性差,且节律控制的疗效和耐受性数据有限,因此治疗具有挑战性。我们报告了在我们的淀粉样变中心观察性研究中,在 2005 年至 2019 年间诊断为野生型或遗传性ATTR-CM 的患者中,AF/AFL 的结局,包括 84 例患者(平均年龄 74 ± 10 岁,94%为男性),随访时间为 27.6 ± 22.8 个月。61 例患者(73%)发生 AF/AFL。快速心室反应很常见,尝试过心率控制。然而,经常停用心率控制药物(80%),通常是因为不良反应。尝试节律控制的患者占 64%,通常采用直流电复律(DCCV)或消融。DCCV 后复发很常见(91%),且有或无抗心律失常药物时的复发时间相似(5.8 个月(IQR 1.9-12.5)vs 6.2 个月(IQR 1.9-12.5),p = 0.83)。23%的 AFL 患者进行了消融(均为典型 AFL),平均 60.9 个月后有 14%的患者复发。12%的 AF 患者进行了消融,中位时间为 6.2 个月(IQR 5.6-12.3)后有 86%的患者复发。大多数(62%)有节律控制的患者主观改善(≥1 NYHA 分级或心悸消失)。结论,AF/AFL 在我们的队列中很常见。心率控制的耐受性差,且常被放弃。节律控制使大多数病例的症状得到改善,但持续成功有限。DCCV 略有疗效,且抗心律失常药物并无显著改善。DCCV 对典型 AFL 有效,但对 AF 的效果有限。