• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼骨缺损合并骨盆连续性中断的 Paprosky III 型患者定制髋臼假体植入失败的风险因素。

Risk factors for implant failure of custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss and combined pelvic discontinuity.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2022;30(3):703-711. doi: 10.3233/THC-202236.

DOI:10.3233/THC-202236
PMID:34366301
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA), both with or without pelvic discontinuity, remains a great challenge in orthopaedic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for failure of custom-made acetabular implants in RTHA.

METHODS

Seventy patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type III) and pelvic discontinuity, who required RTHA, were included in our study. All prostheses were constructed based on a thin-layer computed-tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis. The treatment was considered unsuccessful in the event of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or aseptic loosening (AL) with need for explantation of the custom-made acetabular implant.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 41.9 ± 34.8 months (range 1.5-120). Implant survival at last follow-up was 75.7% (53 of 70). Explantation was necessary in 17 cases (15 PJI; 2 AL). Previous PJI as reason for RTHA (p= 0.025; OR 3.56 (95% CI: 1.14; 11.21)), additional revision of femoral components (p= 0.003; OR 8.4 (95% CI: 1.75; 40.42)), rheumatoid disease (p= 0.039; OR 3.43 (95% CI: 1.01; 11.40)), elevated preoperative CRP > 15.2 mg/l (p= 0.015; AUC: 0.7) and preoperative haemoglobin < 10.05 (p= 0.022; AUC: 0.69) were statistically significant risk factors associated with treatment failure. Age and BMI were not statistically significant contributing to implant failure.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for treatment failure were a previous PJI, additional revision of femoral component, rheumatoid disease, elevated preoperative CRP and low preoperative haemoglobin. Awareness of these risk factors will help to improve future treatment standards.

摘要

背景

在翻修全髋关节置换术(RTHA)中,无论是髋臼存在严重骨缺损还是骨盆连续性中断,都对骨科医生提出了巨大的挑战。

目的

本研究旨在评估定制髋臼假体在 RTHA 中失败的危险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了 70 例患有严重髋臼骨缺损(Paprosky Ⅲ型)和骨盆连续性中断,需要接受 RTHA 的患者。所有假体均基于骨盆薄层 CT 扫描构建。如果出现假体周围关节感染(PJI)或无菌性松动(AL),需要取出定制髋臼假体,则认为治疗失败。

结果

平均随访时间为 41.9±34.8 个月(范围 1.5-120 个月)。末次随访时,假体的生存率为 75.7%(70 例中有 53 例)。17 例(15 例 PJI,2 例 AL)需要取出假体。RTHA 之前存在 PJI(p=0.025;OR 3.56(95% CI:1.14;11.21))、股骨部件的附加翻修(p=0.003;OR 8.4(95% CI:1.75;40.42))、类风湿性疾病(p=0.039;OR 3.43(95% CI:1.01;11.40))、术前 CRP>15.2mg/l(p=0.015;AUC:0.7)和术前血红蛋白<10.05g/dl(p=0.022;AUC:0.69)是与治疗失败相关的统计学显著危险因素。年龄和 BMI 与假体失败无统计学显著相关性。

结论

治疗失败的危险因素包括先前的 PJI、股骨部件的附加翻修、类风湿性疾病、术前 CRP 升高和术前血红蛋白降低。了解这些危险因素将有助于提高未来的治疗标准。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for implant failure of custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss and combined pelvic discontinuity.髋臼骨缺损合并骨盆连续性中断的 Paprosky III 型患者定制髋臼假体植入失败的风险因素。
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(3):703-711. doi: 10.3233/THC-202236.
2
Outcome of repeated multi-stage arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with severe acetabular bone loss: a case series.反复多次定制髋臼假体成形术治疗严重髋臼骨缺损患者的结果:病例系列研究。
Hip Int. 2020 Sep;30(1_suppl):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1120700020928247.
3
Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss.翻修术后采用定制髋臼假体治疗 Paprosky III 型髋臼骨缺损的中期疗效。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Feb;140(2):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03318-0. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty.髋关节翻修术中严重髋臼周围骨丢失合并骨盆连续性中断的处理
Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2455-61. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2443-6. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
5
Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.翻修全髋关节置换术中严重髋臼骨缺损的髋臼定制假体:文献系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Mar;140(3):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03334-5. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
Clinical study of outcomes after revision surgery using porous titanium custom-made implants for severe acetabular septic bone defects.使用定制多孔钛植入物修复严重髋臼感染性骨缺损的翻修手术后结局的临床研究
Int Orthop. 2020 Oct;44(10):1957-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04623-9. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Standard Versus Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.标准与定制髋臼假体在翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jan;37(1):119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.杯笼重建治疗严重髋臼骨缺损和骨盆不连续:35 例连续病例的中期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1442-1448. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0481.R1.
9
Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity.多孔钽和定制三叶型部件在髋臼缺损和骨盆不连续患者治疗中的虚拟生物力学评估。
Bone Joint J. 2024 May 1;106-B(5 Supple B):74-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B5.BJJ-2023-0852.R1.
10
Survival analysis of 3D printed acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty associated with severe pelvic discontinuities.3D打印髋臼植入物在伴有严重骨盆不连续的翻修全髋关节置换术中的生存分析。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(5):3783-3792. doi: 10.3233/THC-231647.

引用本文的文献

1
Monoflange custom-made partial pelvis replacements offer a viable solution in extensive Paprosky III defects.单翼定制型部分骨盆置换术为广泛的Paprosky III型缺损提供了一种可行的解决方案。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Aug 22;5(8):688-696. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0029.R1.
2
Custom-made implants for massive acetabular bone loss: accuracy with CT assessment.定制植入物治疗髋臼骨量大量丢失:CT 评估的准确性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 30;18(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04230-5.
3
Custom triflange acetabular components for large acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 1218 patients.
定制三叶髋臼组件用于翻修全髋关节置换术中大髋臼缺损重建:对1218例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Jul 3;8(7):522-531. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0081.
4
Impact of three-dimensional printed planning in Paprosky III acetabular defects: a case-control and cost-comparison analysis.三维打印规划对 Paprosky III 型髋臼缺损的影响:病例对照和成本比较分析。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jun;47(6):1465-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05763-4. Epub 2023 Mar 17.