• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业绿色债券:在双因素结构模型中理解绿色溢价

Corporate Green Bonds: Understanding the Greenium in a Two-Factor Structural Model.

作者信息

Agliardi Elettra, Agliardi Rossella

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Bologna, piazza Scaravilli 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Department of Mathematics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2021;80(2):257-278. doi: 10.1007/s10640-021-00585-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10640-021-00585-7
PMID:34366567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328352/
Abstract

A novel structural model is developed to understand the determinants of green bond prices and the so-called 'greenium', that is, the premium that bondholders are willing to pay to invest in green securities rather than conventional ones. The presence of a greenium makes green bonds relatively cheap vehicles to fund environmentally sustainable projects and thus contributes to the shift to a green economy. Yet, evidence on the greenium is mixed and the determinants of green bond yields are not fully understood. In this model two sources of uncertainty are introduced, that is, of cash flows of the firm and of the effectiveness of the financed green projects. The adoption of two risk factors brings in some mathematical complexity but allows for a better modelling of the multi-facet nature of these financial instruments. Our model is rich enough to generate both a positive and a negative premium, as both have been detected in the empirical literature. Thus, we shed light on possible heterogeneity concerning the existence of a greenium in the green bond universe. Moreover, we show how green bonds affect the issuer's creditworthiness, depending on the correlation of the green project with the core business of the firm and study their impact on investors' portfolio allocation.

摘要

为理解绿色债券价格的决定因素以及所谓的“绿色溢价”(即债券持有人愿意为投资绿色证券而非传统证券支付的溢价),开发了一种新颖的结构模型。绿色溢价的存在使绿色债券成为为环境可持续项目融资的相对低成本工具,从而有助于向绿色经济转型。然而,关于绿色溢价的证据喜忧参半,且绿色债券收益率的决定因素尚未完全明晰。在该模型中引入了两个不确定性来源,即公司现金流的不确定性和所融资绿色项目有效性的不确定性。采用两个风险因素带来了一定的数学复杂性,但能更好地对这些金融工具的多面性质进行建模。我们的模型足够丰富,能够产生正溢价和负溢价,因为实证文献中都已发现了这两种情况。因此,我们揭示了绿色债券领域中绿色溢价存在可能的异质性。此外,我们展示了绿色债券如何根据绿色项目与公司核心业务的相关性影响发行人的信用状况,并研究它们对投资者投资组合配置的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e497/8328352/549ac2d080c0/10640_2021_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e497/8328352/549ac2d080c0/10640_2021_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e497/8328352/549ac2d080c0/10640_2021_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Corporate Green Bonds: Understanding the Greenium in a Two-Factor Structural Model.企业绿色债券:在双因素结构模型中理解绿色溢价
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2021;80(2):257-278. doi: 10.1007/s10640-021-00585-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Risk measures and portfolio analysis in the paradigm of climate finance: a review.气候金融范式下的风险度量与投资组合分析:综述
SN Bus Econ. 2023;3(3):69. doi: 10.1007/s43546-023-00449-w. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?在新冠疫情期间发行债券:是否存在环境、社会和治理(ESG)溢价?
Int Rev Financ Anal. 2023 Jul;88:102653. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102653. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
4
Greenium of green securitization: Does external certification matter?绿色证券发行的绿色溢价:外部认证是否重要?
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 12;19(8):e0306814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306814. eCollection 2024.
5
Do foreign investors affect the volatility of local currency bond prices? Empirical evidence from China.外国投资者会影响本币债券价格的波动性吗?来自中国的经验证据。
Heliyon. 2023 May 29;9(6):e16658. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16658. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Comparing the willingness to invest returns among green, sustainability, and blue bonds.比较绿色、可持续性和蓝色债券的投资回报意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;364:121458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121458. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
7
Understanding the Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices and Dynamic Sustainable Capabilities on Corporate Sustainable Performance: Evidence From the Manufacturing Sector.理解绿色人力资源管理实践与动态可持续能力对企业可持续绩效的影响:来自制造业的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 29;13:844488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844488. eCollection 2022.
8
The dependence of Chinese green and conventional bond markets under extreme and normal market conditions.极端和正常市场条件下中国绿色债券和传统债券市场的依存关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(38):53208-53223. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14050-x. Epub 2021 May 22.
9
Monitoring or Colluding? Institutional Investors' Heterogeneity and Environmental Information Disclosure Behavior.监督还是合谋?机构投资者异质性与环境信息披露行为
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:911901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911901. eCollection 2022.
10
Does It Pay to Issue Green? An Institutional Comparison of Mainland China and Hong Kong's Stock Markets Toward Green Bonds.发行绿色债券是否值得?中国大陆与香港股票市场对绿色债券的制度比较
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:833847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833847. eCollection 2022.