Suppr超能文献

阅读障碍研究领域被引用次数最多的100项研究:文献计量分析

The 100 Top-Cited Studies on Dyslexia Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Shijie, Fan Hong, Zhang Yonggang

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Periodical Press and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 22;12:714627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.714627. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Citation analysis is a type of quantitative and bibliometric analytic method designed to rank papers based on their citation counts. Over the last few decades, the research on dyslexia has made some progress which helps us to assess this disease, but a citation analysis on dyslexia that reflects these advances is lacking. A retrospective bibliometric analysis was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection database. The 100 top-cited studies on dyslexia were retrieved after reviewing abstracts or full-texts to May 20th, 2021. Data from the 100 top-cited studies were subsequently extracted and analyzed. The 100 top-cited studies on dyslexia were cited between 245 to 1,456 times, with a median citation count of 345. These studies were published in 50 different journals, with the "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America" having published the most ( = 10). The studies were published between 1973 and 2012 and the most prolific year in terms of number of publications was 2000. Eleven countries contributed to the 100 top-cited studies, and nearly 75% articles were either from the USA ( = 53) or United Kingdom ( = 21). Eighteen researchers published at least two different studies of the 100 top-cited list as the first author. Furthermore, 71 studies were published as an original research article, 28 studies were review articles, and one study was published as an editorial material. Finally, "Psychology" was the most frequent study category. This analysis provides a better understanding on dyslexia and may help doctors, researchers, and stakeholders to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of classic studies, new discoveries, and trends regarding this research field, thus promoting ideas for future investigation.

摘要

引文分析是一种定量和文献计量分析方法,旨在根据论文的被引次数对其进行排名。在过去几十年中,关于诵读困难症的研究取得了一些进展,这有助于我们评估这种疾病,但缺乏反映这些进展的诵读困难症引文分析。使用科学网核心合集数据库进行了一项回顾性文献计量分析。在查阅摘要或全文至2021年5月20日之后,检索了关于诵读困难症的100篇被引频次最高的研究。随后提取并分析了这100篇被引频次最高的研究的数据。关于诵读困难症的100篇被引频次最高的研究被引用了245至1456次,中位数被引次数为3条45次。这些研究发表在50种不同的期刊上,其中《美国国家科学院院刊》发表的最多(=10篇)。这些研究发表于1973年至2012年之间,发表数量最多的年份是2000年。11个国家为这100篇被引频次最高的研究做出了贡献,近75%的文章来自美国(=53篇)或英国(=21篇)。18位研究人员作为第一作者发表了至少两篇不同的研究,位列这100篇被引频次最高的列表中。此外,71项研究作为原创研究文章发表,28项研究为综述文章,1项研究作为编辑材料发表。最后,“心理学”是最常见的研究类别。该分析有助于更好地理解诵读困难症,并可能帮助医生、研究人员和利益相关者更全面地了解该研究领域的经典研究、新发现和趋势,从而促进未来研究的思路。

相似文献

1
The 100 Top-Cited Studies on Dyslexia Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 22;12:714627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.714627. eCollection 2021.
2
The 100 top-cited studies on vaccine: a bibliometric analysis.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(12):3024-3031. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1614398. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
3
The 100 Top-Cited Studies on Neuropsychology: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:550716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550716. eCollection 2020.
4
The top 100 cited studies on bacterial persisters: A bibliometric analysis.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 13;13:1001861. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1001861. eCollection 2022.
5
6
The 100 Top-Cited Studies on Loneliness: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Cureus. 2023 Apr 7;15(4):e37246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37246. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
The 100 top-cited publications in psoriatic arthritis: a bibliometric analysis.
Int J Dermatol. 2019 Sep;58(9):1023-1034. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14261. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on astrocytoma.
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Feb 17;12:62. doi: 10.25259/SNI_521_2020. eCollection 2021.
9
Top 100 Most-Cited Papers in Neuropathic Pain From 2000 to 2020: A Bibliometric Study.
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 12;12:765193. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.765193. eCollection 2021.
10
The top 100 cited articles in pediatric urology: A bibliometric analysis.
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Oct;17(5):709.e1-709.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Early predictors in language-based learning disabilities: a bibliometric analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 4;14:1229580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1229580. eCollection 2023.
2
Trends in exercise for hypertension: a bibliometric analysis.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 23;10:1260569. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1260569. eCollection 2023.
4
The top 100 cited studies on bacterial persisters: A bibliometric analysis.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 13;13:1001861. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1001861. eCollection 2022.
5
Global Trends and Research Hotspots of Exercise for Intervening Diabetes: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;10:902825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902825. eCollection 2022.
6
Dyslexia: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:915053. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.915053. eCollection 2022.
7
Scientometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most-Cited Joint Arthroplasty Papers: Traditional vs Altmetric Measures.
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Apr 12;15:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Trends of High-Impact Studies in Pharmacology and Pharmacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 16;12:726668. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.726668. eCollection 2021.
9
Analysis of the Most-Cited Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Acupuncture Research.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Sep 16;2021:3469122. doi: 10.1155/2021/3469122. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The top 100 most-cited papers in Paediatric Dentistry journals: A bibliometric analysis.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Nov;29(6):692-711. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12563. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
E-book reading hinders aspects of long-text comprehension for adults with dyslexia.
Ann Dyslexia. 2019 Jul;69(2):243-259. doi: 10.1007/s11881-019-00182-w. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
The 100 top-cited studies on vaccine: a bibliometric analysis.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(12):3024-3031. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1614398. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Bibliometric analysis of global research on PD-1 and PD-L1 in the field of cancer.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Jul;72:374-384. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.03.045. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
Bibliometric analysis of the literature on Ramadan fasting and diabetes in the past three decades (1989-2018).
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May;151:313-322. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
6
Socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: Findings from a cross-sectional study.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(12):e14904. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014904.
7
Citation Classics in Cone Beam Computed Tomography: The 100 Top-Cited Articles.
Int J Dent. 2018 Dec 30;2018:9423281. doi: 10.1155/2018/9423281. eCollection 2018.
9
The 100 most influential manuscripts in andrology: a bibliometric analysis.
Basic Clin Androl. 2018 Dec 12;28:15. doi: 10.1186/s12610-018-0080-4. eCollection 2018.
10
Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Cited Articles in the First 50 Years of Heart Transplantation.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;123(1):175-186. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验