• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根系形态对种群密度的响应随土壤条件和生长阶段而变化:密度效应的复杂性。

Root morphological responses to population density vary with soil conditions and growth stages: The complexity of density effects.

作者信息

Wang Shu, Li Lei, Zhou Dao-Wei

机构信息

College of Forestry Forest Ecology Research Center Guizhou University Guiyang China.

Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Sciences Nanchang University Nanchang China.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 7;11(15):10590-10599. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7868. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.7868
PMID:34367599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328429/
Abstract

AIM

How plants cope with increases in population density via root plasticity is not well documented, although abiotic environments and plant ontogeny may have important roles in determining root response to density. To investigate how plant root plasticity in response to density varies with soil conditions and growth stages, we conducted a field experiment with an annual herbaceous species ().

METHODS

Plants were grown at low, medium, and high densities (13.4, 36.0, and 121.0 plants m, respectively), under fertile and infertile soil conditions, and a series of root traits were measured after 30, 50, and 70 days.

RESULTS

Root allocation increased, decreased, or canalized in response to density, depending on soil conditions and stages of plant growth, indicating the complex effects of population density, including both competitive and facilitative effects.

MAIN CONCLUSIONS

Root allocation was promoted by neighbor roots at early stages and in abundant resource availability, due to low-to-moderate belowground interactions among smaller plants, leading to facilitation. As plants grew, competition intensified and infertile soil aggravated belowground competition, leading to decreased root allocation in response to density. Root growth may be more likely restricted horizontally rather than vertically by the presence of neighbor, suggesting a spatial orientation effect in their responses to density. We emphasized the importance of considering effects of abiotic conditions and plant growth stages in elucidating the complexity of density effects on root traits.

摘要

目的

尽管非生物环境和植物个体发育在决定根系对密度的响应方面可能具有重要作用,但植物如何通过根系可塑性应对种群密度增加的情况尚无充分记录。为了研究植物根系对密度的可塑性响应如何随土壤条件和生长阶段而变化,我们对一种一年生草本植物进行了田间试验。

方法

将植物分别种植在低密度、中密度和高密度(分别为13.4、36.0和121.0株/平方米)条件下,设置肥沃和贫瘠两种土壤条件,并在30天、50天和70天后测量一系列根系性状。

结果

根系分配随密度增加而增加、减少或趋于稳定,这取决于土壤条件和植物生长阶段,表明种群密度具有复杂影响,包括竞争和促进作用。

主要结论

在早期阶段以及资源丰富时,相邻根系会促进根系分配,这是因为较小植株之间地下低到中等程度的相互作用会产生促进作用。随着植物生长,竞争加剧,贫瘠土壤会加重地下竞争,导致根系分配随密度增加而减少。相邻植株的存在可能更倾向于在水平方向而非垂直方向限制根系生长,这表明它们对密度的响应存在空间取向效应。我们强调了在阐明密度对根系性状影响的复杂性时考虑非生物条件和植物生长阶段影响的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/f93c3abd1c25/ECE3-11-10590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/fe4208d703b8/ECE3-11-10590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/b485843a2ab0/ECE3-11-10590-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/f93c3abd1c25/ECE3-11-10590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/fe4208d703b8/ECE3-11-10590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/b485843a2ab0/ECE3-11-10590-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598d/8328429/f93c3abd1c25/ECE3-11-10590-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Root morphological responses to population density vary with soil conditions and growth stages: The complexity of density effects.根系形态对种群密度的响应随土壤条件和生长阶段而变化:密度效应的复杂性。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 7;11(15):10590-10599. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7868. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Morphological canalization, integration, and plasticity in response to population density in : Influences of soil conditions and growth stages.形态学上的渠道化、整合以及对种群密度的可塑性响应:土壤条件和生长阶段的影响
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 28;11(17):11945-11959. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7960. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Plasticity in response to plant-plant interactions and water availability.对植物-植物相互作用和水分可利用性的响应中的可塑性。
Ecology. 2021 Jun;102(6):e03361. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3361. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Do shallow soil, low water availability, or their combination increase the competition between grasses with different root systems in karst soil?浅薄的土壤、低水分可利用性或它们的组合是否会加剧喀斯特土壤中具有不同根系的草本植物之间的竞争?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(11):10640-10651. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8675-4. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
5
Effects of Temporal Heterogeneity of Water Supply and Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Nutrients on the Growth and Intraspecific Competition of Depend on Plant Density.水分供应时间异质性和土壤养分空间异质性对[植物名称]生长及种内竞争的影响取决于种植密度。 (你原文中“Depend on Plant Density”前的植物名称缺失,我按格式要求翻译了完整句子结构,你可补充完整植物名称)
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 11;9:1987. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01987. eCollection 2018.
6
Associations between leaf developmental stability, variability, canalization, and phenotypic plasticity in .叶片发育稳定性、变异性、定向化与表型可塑性之间的关联 。 (原文句子不完整,推测是某个研究领域中关于叶片这些特性之间关系的表述)
Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr 17;12(4):e8845. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8845. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
[Response of fine roots to soil nutrient spatial heterogeneity].[细根对土壤养分空间异质性的响应]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2004 Jun;15(6):1063-8.
8
Above-ground competition does not alter biomass allocated to roots in Abutilon theophrasti.地上竞争不会改变苘麻分配到根部的生物量。
New Phytol. 1998 Oct;140(2):231-238. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00271.x.
9
Splitting the Difference: Heterogeneous Soil Moisture Availability Affects Aboveground and Belowground Reserve and Mass Allocation in Trembling Aspen.权衡差异:土壤水分有效性的异质性影响颤杨地上和地下储备及物质分配
Front Plant Sci. 2021 May 14;12:654159. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.654159. eCollection 2021.
10
Belowground plant competition: uncoupling root response strategies of peas.地下植物竞争:解除豌豆根系响应策略的耦合
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jul;291(2027):20240673. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0673. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic morphological plasticity in response to emergence timing in (Malvaceae).锦葵科植物中响应出苗时间的动态形态可塑性。
Plant Environ Interact. 2022 Jun 18;3(3):118-129. doi: 10.1002/pei3.10084. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Associations between leaf developmental stability, variability, canalization, and phenotypic plasticity in .叶片发育稳定性、变异性、定向化与表型可塑性之间的关联 。 (原文句子不完整,推测是某个研究领域中关于叶片这些特性之间关系的表述)
Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr 17;12(4):e8845. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8845. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Biomass Allocation Responses to Root Interactions in Wheat Cultivars Support Predictions of Crop Evolutionary Ecology Theory.

本文引用的文献

1
Above-ground competition does not alter biomass allocated to roots in Abutilon theophrasti.地上竞争不会改变苘麻分配到根部的生物量。
New Phytol. 1998 Oct;140(2):231-238. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00271.x.
2
Plasticity in response to plant-plant interactions and water availability.对植物-植物相互作用和水分可利用性的响应中的可塑性。
Ecology. 2021 Jun;102(6):e03361. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3361. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Root and shoot competition lead to contrasting competitive outcomes under water stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
小麦品种中生物量分配对根系相互作用的响应支持作物进化生态学理论的预测。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 23;13:858636. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.858636. eCollection 2022.
4
Phenotypic variation in photosynthetic traits in wheat grown under field versus glasshouse conditions.田间和温室条件下生长的小麦光合特性的表型变异。
J Exp Bot. 2022 May 23;73(10):3221-3237. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac096.
5
Morphological canalization, integration, and plasticity in response to population density in : Influences of soil conditions and growth stages.形态学上的渠道化、整合以及对种群密度的可塑性响应:土壤条件和生长阶段的影响
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 28;11(17):11945-11959. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7960. eCollection 2021 Sep.
根系和地上部竞争导致水分胁迫下的竞争结果截然不同:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 11;14(12):e0220674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220674. eCollection 2019.
4
Neighbouring plants modify maize root foraging for phosphorus: coupling nutrients and neighbours for improved nutrient-use efficiency.邻近植物改变玉米根系对磷的觅食:耦合养分和邻居以提高养分利用效率。
New Phytol. 2020 Apr;226(1):244-253. doi: 10.1111/nph.16206. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Facilitation May Buffer Competitive Effects: Indirect and Diffuse Interactions among Salt Marsh Plants.促进作用可能缓冲竞争效应:盐沼植物间的间接和扩散相互作用
Am Nat. 2000 Oct;156(4):416-424. doi: 10.1086/303398.
6
Subtle variation in shade avoidance responses may have profound consequences for plant competitiveness.遮荫回避反应的细微变化可能对植物竞争力产生深远的影响。
Ann Bot. 2018 Apr 18;121(5):863-873. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx151.
7
Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field.室内娇养,户外受扰?可控环境下与田间种植植物的异同
New Phytol. 2016 Dec;212(4):838-855. doi: 10.1111/nph.14243. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
8
Plant architecture, plasticity, and adaptation strategies of two oat genotypes under different competition intensities.两种燕麦基因型在不同竞争强度下的株型、可塑性及适应策略
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Mar 30;96(5):1431-9. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7237. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Competing neighbors: light perception and root function.相互竞争的邻居:光感知与根系功能
Oecologia. 2014 Sep;176(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2983-x. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
10
Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control.生物量在叶片、茎和根中的分配:种间变异和环境控制的荟萃分析。
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):30-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.