Seeff L B, Wright E C, Zimmerman H J, Alter H J, Dietz A A, Felsher B F, Finkelstein J D, Garcia-Pont P, Gerin J L, Greenlee H B, Hamilton J, Holland P V, Kaplan P M, Kiernan T, Koff R S, Leevy C M, McAuliffe V J, Nath N, Purcell R H, Schiff E R, Schwartz C C, Tamburro C H, Vlahcevic Z, Zemel R, Zimmon D S
Ann Intern Med. 1978 Mar;88(3):285-93. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-3-285.
Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and immune serum globulin (ISG) were examined in a randomized, double-blind trial to assess their relative efficacies in preventing type B hepatitis after needle-stick exposure to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAG)-positive donors. Clinical hepatitis developed in 1.4% of HBIG and in 5.9% of ISG recipients (P = 0.016), and seroconversion (anti-HBs) occurred in 5.6% and 20.7% of them respectively (P less than 0.001). Mild and transient side-effects were noted in 3.0% of ISG and in 3.2% of HBIG recipients. Available donor sera were examined for DNA polymerase (DNAP) and e antigen and antibody (HBeAg; anti-HBE). Both DNAP and HBeAg showed a highly statistically significant correlation with the infectivity of HBsAg-positive donors. Hepatitis B immune globulin remained significantly superior to ISG in preventing type B hepatitis even when the analysis was confined to these two high-risk subgroups. The efficacy of ISG in preventing type B hepatitis cannot be ascertained because a true placebo group was not included.