Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hum Genet. 2021 Oct;140(10):1403-1416. doi: 10.1007/s00439-021-02331-x. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
Exome sequencing and genome sequencing have the potential to improve clinical utility for patients undergoing genetic investigations. However, evidence of clinical utility is limited to pediatric populations; we aimed to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of the literature on the clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across disease indications in pediatric and adult populations. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched between 2016 and 2020. Quantitative studies evaluating diagnostic yield were included; other measures of clinical utility such as changes to clinical management were documented if reported. Two reviewers screened, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Fifty studies met our inclusion criteria. All studies reported diagnostic yield, which ranged from 3 to 70%, with higher range of yields reported for neurological indications and acute illness ranging from 22 to 68% and 37-70%, respectively. Diagnoses triggered a range of clinical management changes including surveillance, reproductive-risk counseling, and identifying at-risk relatives in 4-100% of patients, with higher frequencies reported for acute illness ranging from 67 to 95%. The frequency of variants of uncertain significance ranged from 5 to 85% across studies with a potential trend of decreasing frequency over time and higher rates identified in patients of non-European ancestry. This review provides evidence for a higher range of diagnostic yield of exome/genome sequencing compared to standard genetic tests, particularly in neurological and acute indications. However, we identified significant heterogeneity in study procedures and outcomes, precluding a meaningful meta-analysis and certainty in the evidence available for decision-making. Future research that incorporates a comprehensive and consistent approach in capturing clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across broader ancestral groups is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy and yield and allow for analysis of trends over time.Prospero registration CRD42019094101.
外显子组测序和全基因组测序有可能提高正在接受基因研究的患者的临床实用性。然而,临床实用性的证据仅限于儿科人群;我们旨在通过对儿科和成人人群中疾病指征的外显子/基因组测序的临床实用性的文献进行系统综述来填补这一空白。在 2016 年至 2020 年期间,我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆。纳入了评估诊断产量的定量研究;如果有报道,记录了其他临床实用性措施,如临床管理的变化。两名审查员筛选、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。有 50 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。所有研究均报告了诊断产量,范围从 3%到 70%,神经指征和急性疾病的范围较高,分别为 22%到 68%和 37%到 70%。诊断结果引发了一系列临床管理变化,包括 4%到 100%的患者进行监测、生殖风险咨询以及识别高危亲属,急性疾病的报告频率更高,范围从 67%到 95%。在不同的研究中,不确定意义的变异的频率范围从 5%到 85%,随着时间的推移,其频率呈下降趋势,在非欧洲血统的患者中识别出更高的频率。本综述提供了证据表明,与标准基因测试相比,外显子/基因组测序具有更高的诊断产量范围,特别是在神经和急性指征方面。然而,我们发现研究程序和结果存在显著异质性,妨碍了对现有证据进行有意义的荟萃分析和决策。未来的研究需要采用综合一致的方法来捕获外显子/基因组测序在更广泛的祖先群体中的临床实用性,以提高诊断准确性和产量,并分析随时间的趋势。Prospéro 注册 CRD42019094101。