Dougher M J, Crossen J R, Ferraro D P, Garland R
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;18(4):337-48. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(87)90048-6.
Although covert sensitization is a widely and diversely employed clinical technique, there is no generally accepted conceptual guideline for its implementation. Consequently, there is considerable variability in the way covert sensitization procedures are employed, which may account for the reported inconsistency in its clinical effectiveness. The present study is an analogue experimental test of a conceptual account of covert sensitization that is based upon classical conditioning. The classical conditioning procedure is viewed as affecting operant target behaviors by altering the reinforcer effectiveness of target stimuli. This was explicitly tested by examining the effects of covert sensitization on subjects' preference for sexual stimuli in an operant choice paradigm. The results support the conceptual account.
尽管内隐性致敏法是一种广泛且多样应用的临床技术,但对于其实施并没有普遍接受的概念性指导方针。因此,内隐性致敏程序的应用方式存在相当大的差异,这可能解释了其临床有效性方面报道的不一致性。本研究是对基于经典条件作用的内隐性致敏概念解释的模拟实验测试。经典条件作用程序被视为通过改变目标刺激的强化效果来影响操作性目标行为。这通过在操作性选择范式中检验内隐性致敏对受试者对性刺激偏好的影响来明确测试。结果支持了这一概念解释。