The Cancer Research Center, HealthPartners/Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022 Feb;7(1):24-33. doi: 10.1089/can.2021.0045. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the potential anticancer activity of cannabinoids, yet little clinical data exist to support this. Nearly 40% of patients with cancer using cannabis believe it will treat their cancer with numerous anecdotal reports shared online through social media platforms. Case reports have been published in peer-reviewed journals, but often lack key clinical information to validate anticancer claims. We reviewed literature in PubMed and EBSCO databases that evaluated the relationship between cannabis or the endocannabinoid system and potential anticancer activity. We also reviewed online sources, books, and ClinicalTrials.gov for reports or studies on using cannabis as cancer treatment. All case reports published in peer-reviewed journals were compiled and appraised as weak, moderate, or strong based on the quality of evidence provided supporting an anticancer effect. Strong reports met three criteria; (a) active cancer at time of cannabis administration, (b) validated laboratory or radiographic responses were reported, and (c) cannabis used without concurrent anticancer treatments. Of the 207 pre-clinical articles reviewed, 107 (52%) were pre-clinical studies with original data. A total of 77 unique case reports described patients with various cancers (breast, central nervous system, gynecological, leukemia, lung, prostate, and pancreatic) using cannabis. Our appraisal showed 14% of the case reports were considered strong, 5% moderate, and the remaining 81% were weak. Ten percent of cases were in pediatric patients. Cannabidiol use was most often reported as the anticancer cannabinoid with daily doses ranging from 10 to 800 mg. Tetrahydrocannabinol use was reported in six studies, with doses ranging from 4.8 to 7.5 mg. Two small trials published data on survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. This review of clinical data suggests most published, peer-reviewed case reports provide insufficient data to support the claim for cannabis as an anticancer agent, and should not be used in place of evidence-based, traditional treatments outside of a clinical trial. No strong clinical trial data exist to confirm the pre-clinical studies that suggest cannabinoids may have an anticancer benefit. Future studies exploring anticancer potential of cannabis in patients with metastatic cancers who have not responded to traditional therapy are needed.
临床前研究已经证明了大麻素具有潜在的抗癌活性,但几乎没有临床数据支持这一点。近 40%的癌症患者认为大麻可以治疗他们的癌症,他们在社交媒体平台上分享了无数的传闻。病例报告已经发表在同行评议的期刊上,但往往缺乏关键的临床信息来验证抗癌的说法。我们在 PubMed 和 EBSCO 数据库中检索了评估大麻或内源性大麻素系统与潜在抗癌活性之间关系的文献。我们还在网上来源、书籍和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上查阅了关于使用大麻治疗癌症的报告或研究。我们根据提供的支持抗癌效果的证据质量,将发表在同行评议期刊上的所有病例报告汇编并评估为弱、中和强。强报告符合三个标准;(a) 大麻治疗时患有活动性癌症,(b) 报告了经过验证的实验室或影像学反应,(c) 没有同时使用其他抗癌治疗。在审查的 207 篇临床前文章中,有 107 篇(52%)是具有原始数据的临床前研究。总共 77 份独特的病例报告描述了患有各种癌症(乳腺癌、中枢神经系统、妇科、白血病、肺癌、前列腺癌和胰腺癌)的患者使用大麻的情况。我们的评估显示,14%的病例报告被认为是强的,5%是中等的,其余 81%是弱的。10%的病例是儿科患者。最常报道的抗癌大麻素是大麻二酚,每日剂量为 10 至 800 毫克。六份研究报告了四氢大麻酚的使用情况,剂量范围为 4.8 至 7.5 毫克。两项小型试验公布了复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的数据。对临床数据的回顾表明,大多数已发表的、经过同行评议的病例报告提供的数据不足以支持大麻作为抗癌药物的说法,并且不应在临床试验之外替代基于证据的传统治疗。没有强有力的临床试验数据来证实那些表明大麻素可能具有抗癌益处的临床前研究。需要进一步研究大麻在对传统治疗无反应的转移性癌症患者中的抗癌潜力。