Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.
Center for Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;21(15):5165. doi: 10.3390/s21155165.
To facilitate the broader use of EMG signal whitening, we studied four whitening procedures of various complexities, as well as the roles of sampling rate and noise correction. We separately analyzed force-varying and constant-force contractions from 64 subjects who completed constant-posture tasks about the elbow over a range of forces from 0% to 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). From the constant-force tasks, we found that noise correction via the root difference of squares (RDS) method consistently reduced EMG recording noise, often by a factor of 5-10. All other primary results were from the force-varying contractions. Sampling at 4096 Hz provided small and statistically significant improvements over sampling at 2048 Hz (3%), which, in turn, provided small improvements over sampling at 1024 Hz (4%). In comparing equivalent processing variants at a sampling rate of 4096 Hz, whitening filters calibrated to the EMG spectrum of each subject generally performed best (4.74% MVC EMG-force error), followed by one universal whitening filter for all subjects (4.83% MVC error), followed by a high-pass filter whitening method (4.89% MVC error) and then a first difference whitening filter (4.91% MVC error)-but none of these statistically differed. Each did significantly improve from EMG-force error without whitening (5.55% MVC). The first difference is an excellent whitening option over this range of contraction forces since no calibration or algorithm decisions are required.
为了促进肌电图信号白化的广泛应用,我们研究了四种不同复杂度的白化程序,以及采样率和噪声校正的作用。我们分别分析了 64 名受试者在 0%至 50%最大自主收缩(MVC)范围内完成肘部恒姿任务时的力变和恒力收缩。从恒力任务中,我们发现通过平方根差(RDS)方法进行噪声校正可以一致地降低肌电图记录噪声,通常降低 5-10 倍。所有其他主要结果均来自力变收缩。以 4096 Hz 采样提供了比以 2048 Hz 采样(约 3%)稍小但具有统计学意义的改进,而以 1024 Hz 采样(约 4%)则稍小。在比较以 4096 Hz 采样率的等效处理变体时,校准每个受试者肌电图频谱的白化滤波器通常表现最佳(4.74% MVC 肌电图力误差),其次是适用于所有受试者的通用白化滤波器(4.83% MVC 误差),其次是高通滤波白化方法(4.89% MVC 误差),然后是一阶差分白化滤波器(4.91% MVC 误差)-但这些都没有统计学差异。每个滤波器都显著改善了未经白化的肌电图力误差(5.55% MVC)。在这个力收缩范围内,一阶差分是一种极好的白化选择,因为不需要校准或算法决策。