Suppr超能文献

氯氮平水平作为治疗反应预测因子的研究:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clozapine levels as a predictor for therapeutic response: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

School of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Nov;144(5):422-432. doi: 10.1111/acps.13361. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine levels may be a more useful predictor of therapeutic response than the dose, given the variability in clozapine metabolism between individuals. We therefore systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the impact of clozapine levels on response and/or relapse to provide guidance on optimal clozapine levels.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase for studies exploring clozapine levels and response and/or relapse. Our primary meta-analysis was rates of response above and below clozapine level thresholds of 350 ng/ml and 600 ng/ml. Secondary analyses were undertaken of mean clozapine levels, dose and concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and response and/or relapse. A meta-regression by study duration was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Clozapine levels above 350 ng/ml were associated with statistically significantly higher rates of response (OR 2.27 95% CI 1.40-3.67, p < 0.001), but not above 600 ng/ml (OR 1.40 95% CI 0.85-2.31, p = 0.19). Higher mean clozapine levels were associated with better rates of response (SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.00-0.49, p = 0.05), and lower rates of relapse (SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.19, p = 0.008). By contrast, neither clozapine dose nor C/D ratio was associated with differing rates of response. Similarly, study duration did not affect outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are in keeping with current guidelines that recommend targeting clozapine levels above 350 ng/ml before augmentation is considered. As some clozapine associated ADRs are dose dependent, levels above 600 ng/ml may have an unfavourable risk-benefit ratio.

摘要

目的

鉴于个体间氯氮平代谢存在差异,氯氮平水平可能比剂量更能预测治疗反应。因此,我们系统地回顾和荟萃分析了氯氮平水平对反应和/或复发的影响,为确定最佳氯氮平水平提供指导。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Embase 中探讨氯氮平水平与反应和/或复发的研究。我们的主要荟萃分析是氯氮平水平高于和低于 350ng/ml 和 600ng/ml 阈值时的反应率。还进行了平均氯氮平水平、剂量和浓度/剂量(C/D)比与反应和/或复发的二次分析。通过研究持续时间进行了荟萃回归分析。

结果

有 20 项研究符合纳入标准。氯氮平水平高于 350ng/ml 与反应率显著更高相关(OR 2.27,95%CI 1.40-3.67,p<0.001),但高于 600ng/ml 时则不然(OR 1.40,95%CI 0.85-2.31,p=0.19)。较高的平均氯氮平水平与更好的反应率相关(SMD 0.24,95%CI 0.00-0.49,p=0.05),复发率更低(SMD-0.72,95%CI-1.26 至-0.19,p=0.008)。相比之下,氯氮平剂量和 C/D 比均与反应率无差异相关。同样,研究持续时间也不影响结果。

结论

我们的发现与当前的指南一致,该指南建议在考虑增效治疗之前将氯氮平水平目标定在 350ng/ml 以上。由于一些氯氮平相关的不良反应与剂量有关,因此水平高于 600ng/ml 可能具有不利的风险效益比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验