• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脉压作为预测妊娠重度高血压治疗反应的指标。

Pulse pressure as a predictor of response to treatment for severe hypertension in pregnancy.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100455. Epub 2021 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100455
PMID:34375751
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulse pressure is a proposed means of tailoring antihypertensive therapy for treatment of acute-onset, severe hypertension in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether pulse pressure predicts response to the various first-line antihypertensive medications.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study from a single academic tertiary care center between 2015 and 2018. Patients were screened for inclusion if they had severe hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure of ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥110 mm Hg) lasting at least 15 minutes and were initially treated with intravenous labetalol, intravenous hydralazine, or immediate-release oral nifedipine. If a patient had multiple episodes of acute treatment during the pregnancy, only one episode was included in the analysis. The primary outcome was time to resolution (in minutes) of severe hypertension. To adjust for factors that may have affected time to resolution, we first compared baseline characteristics on the basis of the antihypertensive agent received. We then assessed the association between baseline characteristics and resolution of severe hypertension within 60 minutes of treatment. Regression analysis incorporated pulse pressure and antihypertensive agents into a model to predict resolution within 60 minutes of onset of severe hypertension.

RESULTS

A total of 479 women hospitalized with severe maternal hypertension met the inclusion criteria. Hydralazine was the initial antihypertensive agent administered to 113 women, whereas 233 received labetalol, and 133 received nifedipine. Those who initially received nifedipine had a shorter mean time to resolution of severe hypertension (32.6 minutes vs 46.3 for hydralazine and 50.3 for labetalol; P<.01) and were more likely to have resolution of severe hypertension within 60 minutes (91.0% vs 77.9% for hydralazine and 76.8% for labetalol; P<.01). Nifedipine also resulted in a lower mean posttreatment blood pressure. Regression analysis revealed that a lack of resolution of severe hypertension within 60 minutes was independently associated with 2 measures of hypertension severity (mean arterial pressure of ≥125 mm Hg and the need for ≥2 doses of medication) and pulse pressure of >75 mm Hg at the time of treatment, initial treatment with labetalol, and gestational age of <37 weeks at the time of the hypertensive event (or at delivery if treatment was after delivery). The model's bias-corrected bootstrapped area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.88). Interaction terms between pulse pressure and each antihypertensive agent were not significant and therefore not incorporated into the final model.

CONCLUSION

Pulse pressure did not predict response to the various first-line antihypertensive agents. Initial treatment with oral nifedipine was associated with a higher likelihood of resolution of severe hypertension within 60 minutes of treatment than with intravenous labetalol.

摘要

背景

脉压是一种用于调整降压治疗以治疗妊娠急性发作性重度高血压的方法。

目的

本研究旨在确定脉压是否可以预测各种一线降压药物的反应。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究,来自 2015 年至 2018 年的一家学术性三级保健中心。如果患者有持续至少 15 分钟的重度高血压(定义为收缩压≥160mmHg 或舒张压≥110mmHg),并最初接受静脉拉贝洛尔、静脉肼屈嗪或立即释放硝苯地平治疗,则对其进行筛选以纳入研究。如果患者在怀孕期间有多次急性治疗发作,只分析一次发作。主要结局是重度高血压缓解所需的时间(以分钟计)。为了调整可能影响缓解时间的因素,我们首先根据所接受的降压药物比较了基线特征。然后评估了基线特征与治疗后 60 分钟内重度高血压缓解之间的关联。回归分析将脉压和降压药物纳入模型,以预测重度高血压发作后 60 分钟内的缓解。

结果

共有 479 名因重度产妇高血压住院的女性符合纳入标准。113 名女性最初接受肼屈嗪作为降压药物,而 233 名女性接受拉贝洛尔,133 名女性接受硝苯地平。最初接受硝苯地平的患者重度高血压缓解的平均时间更短(32.6 分钟,而肼屈嗪为 46.3 分钟,拉贝洛尔为 50.3 分钟;P<.01),在 60 分钟内缓解重度高血压的可能性更高(91.0%,而肼屈嗪为 77.9%,拉贝洛尔为 76.8%;P<.01)。硝苯地平还导致平均治疗后血压降低。回归分析显示,60 分钟内未缓解重度高血压与 2 项高血压严重程度指标(平均动脉压≥125mmHg 和需要≥2 剂药物)和治疗时脉压>75mmHg、初始使用拉贝洛尔以及高血压事件时的胎龄<37 周(如果分娩后进行治疗,则为分娩时)独立相关。模型校正后的偏倚自举接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.85(95%置信区间,0.79-0.88)。脉压与每种降压药物之间的交互项不显著,因此未纳入最终模型。

结论

脉压不能预测各种一线降压药物的反应。与静脉拉贝洛尔相比,初始口服硝苯地平治疗在 60 分钟内缓解重度高血压的可能性更高。

相似文献

1
Pulse pressure as a predictor of response to treatment for severe hypertension in pregnancy.脉压作为预测妊娠重度高血压治疗反应的指标。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100455. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
2
Intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine for acute hypertension in pregnancy: effects on cerebral perfusion pressure.静脉注射拉贝洛尔与口服硝苯地平治疗妊娠高血压急症:对脑灌注压的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):441.e1-441.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
3
Identification of factors associated with delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergencies.识别与产科高血压急症治疗延迟相关的因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):250.e1-250.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
4
Oral antihypertensive regimens (nifedipine retard, labetalol, and methyldopa) for management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.口服降压方案(硝苯地平控释片、拉贝洛尔和甲基多巴)治疗妊娠重度高血压:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 21;394(10203):1011-1021. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31282-6. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Severe maternal morbidity in a large cohort of women with acute severe intrapartum hypertension.急性严重产时高血压大样本孕妇的严重产妇发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):91.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.176. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
6
Factors associated with appropriate treatment of acute-onset severe obstetrical hypertension.与急性发作严重产科高血压的适当治疗相关的因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):329.e1-329.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Physiologic Treatment of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy and Postpartum.妊娠与产后严重高血压的生理治疗。
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;143(2):277-280. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005472. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Factor analysis, including antihypertensive medication, of the outcome of pregnancy in pregnancy-associated hypertension.妊娠合并高血压患者妊娠结局的因素分析,包括抗高血压药物治疗情况。
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2001;24(2):124-8. doi: 10.1159/000054218.
9
Postpartum Hypertension: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.产后高血压:病因、诊断与管理
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Apr;72(4):248-252. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000424.
10
Risk of postpartum readmission after hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and variation by discharge antihypertensive medication prescription.妊娠高血压疾病后产后再次入院的风险及出院时降压药物处方的变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;231(4):456.e1-456.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulse Pressure as a Hemodynamic Parameter in Preeclampsia with Severe Features Accompanied by Fetal Growth Restriction.脉压作为重度子痫前期伴胎儿生长受限的血流动力学参数
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 24;13(15):4318. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154318.
2
Effects of inspiratory muscle training in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis.吸气肌训练对高血压患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 23;10:1113509. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1113509. eCollection 2023.