• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2001 年至 2016 年期间实施的加拿大烟草控制政策的投资回报率。

Return on investment of Canadian tobacco control policies implemented between 2001 and 2016.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):233-238. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056473. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056473
PMID:34376563
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the return on investment (ROI) associated with tobacco control policies implemented between 2001 and 2016 in Canada.

METHODS

Canadian expenditures on tobacco policies were collected from government sources. The economic benefits considered in our analyses (decrease in healthcare costs, productivity costs and monetised life years lost, as well as tax revenues) were based on the changes in smoking prevalence and attributable deaths derived from the SimSmoke simulation model for the period 2001-2016. The net economic benefit (monetised benefits minus expenditures) and ROI associated with these policies were determined from the government and societal perspectives. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to check the robustness of the result. Costs were expressed in 2019 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

The total of provincial and federal expenditures associated with the implementation of tobacco control policies in Canada from 2001 through 2016 was estimated at $2.4 billion. Total economic benefits from these policies during that time were calculated at $49.2 billion from the government perspective and at $54.2 billion from the societal perspective. The corresponding ROIs were $19.8 and $21.9 for every dollar invested. Sensitivity analyses yielded ROI values ranging from $16.3 to $28.3 for every dollar invested depending on the analyses and perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis has found that the costs to implement the Canadian tobacco policies between 2001 and 2016 were far outweighed by the monetised value associated with the benefits of these policies, making a powerful case for the investment in tobacco control policies.

摘要

目的

确定 2001 年至 2016 年期间在加拿大实施的烟草控制政策的投资回报率(ROI)。

方法

从政府来源收集加拿大烟草政策支出。我们分析中考虑的经济效益(医疗保健成本、生产力成本和货币化生命年损失的减少,以及税收收入)基于 SimSmoke 模拟模型得出的 2001-2016 年期间吸烟率和归因死亡人数的变化。从政府和社会角度确定这些政策的净经济效益(货币化效益减去支出)和 ROI。进行敏感性分析以检查结果的稳健性。成本以 2019 加元表示。

结果

2001 年至 2016 年期间,加拿大实施烟草控制政策的省级和联邦支出总额估计为 24 亿美元。从政府角度来看,这些政策在此期间的总经济效益为 492 亿美元,从社会角度来看为 542 亿美元。相应的投资回报率为每投资 1 美元获得 19.8 美元和 21.9 美元。敏感性分析得出,根据分析和视角的不同,每投资 1 美元的 ROI 值范围在 16.3 美元至 28.3 美元之间。

结论

这项分析发现,2001 年至 2016 年期间实施加拿大烟草政策的成本远远超过了这些政策效益的货币化价值,为烟草控制政策的投资提供了有力的理由。

相似文献

1
Return on investment of Canadian tobacco control policies implemented between 2001 and 2016.2001 年至 2016 年期间实施的加拿大烟草控制政策的投资回报率。
Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):233-238. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056473. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
2
Estimating the public economic consequences of introducing varenicline smoking cessation therapy in South Korea using a fiscal analytic framework.使用财政分析框架估算在韩国引入伐尼克兰戒烟疗法的公共经济后果。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):571-576. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1434183. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Estimating the return on investment of the New York Tobacco Control Programme: a synthetic control study.评估纽约烟草控制计划的投资回报率:一项合成控制研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 2;14(4):e080525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080525.
4
The role of public policies in reducing smoking: the Minnesota SimSmoke tobacco policy model.公共政策在减少吸烟中的作用:明尼苏达州 SimSmoke 烟草政策模型。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5 Suppl 3):S179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.037.
5
Estimating the return on investment of the Bureau of Tobacco Free Florida tobacco control programme from 1999 to 2015.估算 1999 年至 2015 年佛罗里达州无烟烟草控制计划署投资回报率。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):e040012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040012.
6
Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model.路易斯安那州的烟草政策:来自政策模拟模型SimSmoke对未来烟草控制投资的建议。
Prev Sci. 2016 Feb;17(2):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2.
7
The health and economic burden of smoking in 12 Latin American countries and the potential effect of increasing tobacco taxes: an economic modelling study.12 个拉丁美洲国家的吸烟带来的健康和经济负担,以及提高烟草税的潜在影响:一项经济建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1282-e1294. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30311-9.
8
The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: results from the Michigan SimSmoke tobacco policy simulation model.公共政策在降低吸烟流行率方面的作用:来自密歇根州SimSmoke烟草政策模拟模型的结果。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 May;27(5):615-25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0735-4. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in Ireland using the IrelandSS simulation model.利用爱尔兰 SS 模拟模型研究烟草控制政策对爱尔兰吸烟流行率和归因于吸烟的死亡人数的影响。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e25-32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050248. Epub 2012 May 26.
10
Evolving methodology of national tobacco control investment cases.国家控烟投资案例方法的演变。
Tob Control. 2024 May 2;33(Suppl 1):s10-s16. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058336.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic burden of smoking in Belgium: incremental healthcare costs and lost productivity.比利时吸烟造成的经济负担:增加的医疗保健成本和生产力损失。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Feb 1;35(1):108-113. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae211.