Intrinsik Ltd., New Gloucester, Maine, USA.
Stone Environmental Inc., Montpelier, Vermont, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022 May;18(3):757-769. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4508. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
Spray drift buffers are often required on herbicide labels to prevent potential drift effects to nontarget plants. Buffers are typically derived by determining the distance at which predicted exposure from spray drift equals the ecotoxicology threshold for sensitive plant species determined in greenhouse tests. Field studies performed under realistic conditions have demonstrated, however, that this approach is far more conservative than necessary. In 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency estimated that isoxaflutole (IFT), a herbicide used to control grass and broadleaf weeds, could adversely affect downwind nontarget dicot plants at distances of ≥304 m from the edge of the treated field due to spray drift. This prediction implies that a buffer of at least 304 m is required to protect nontarget plants. To refine the predicted buffer distance for IFT, we conducted a field study in which sensitive nontarget plants (lettuce and navy bean, two to four leaf stage) were placed at various distances downwind from previously harvested soybean fields sprayed with Balance Flexx Herbicide. The test plants were then transported to a greenhouse for grow out following the standard vegetative vigor test protocol. There were three trials. One had vegetation in the downwind deposition area (i.e., test plants placed in mowed grass; typical exposure scenario) and two had bare ground deposition areas (worst-case exposure scenario). For both plant species in bare ground deposition areas, effects on shoot height and weight were observed at 1.52 m but not at downwind distances of ≥9.14 m from the edge of the treated area. No effects were observed at any distance for plants placed in the vegetated deposition area. The field study demonstrated that a buffer of 9.14 m protects nontarget terrestrial plants exposed to IFT via spray drift even under worst-case conditions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:757-769. © 2021 Bayer. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
喷雾漂移缓冲区通常需要在除草剂标签上,以防止潜在的漂移效应对非目标植物的影响。缓冲区通常是通过确定预测的喷雾漂移暴露距离等于在温室测试中确定的敏感植物物种的生态毒理学阈值来确定的。然而,在现实条件下进行的田间研究表明,这种方法远过于保守。2016 年,美国环境保护署估计,异噁唑草酮(IFT)是一种用于控制草和阔叶杂草的除草剂,由于喷雾漂移,可能会在距离处理过的田地边缘 304 米≥的下风处对非目标双子叶植物造成不利影响。这一预测意味着需要至少 304 米的缓冲区来保护非目标植物。为了改进 IFT 的预测缓冲区距离,我们进行了一项田间研究,在这项研究中,将敏感的非目标植物(生菜和海军豆,两到四叶期)放置在先前收获的大豆田中喷洒平衡 Flexx 除草剂后下风的不同距离处。测试植物随后按照标准营养生长活力测试协议被运送到温室中进行生长。进行了三次试验。一次是在下风沉积区有植被(即,将测试植物放置在修剪过的草地上;典型的暴露情景),两次是在裸地沉积区(最坏情况暴露情景)。对于裸地沉积区的两种植物,在 1.52 米处观察到对茎高和重量的影响,但在距处理区边缘≥9.14 米的下风距离处没有观察到影响。在植被沉积区放置的植物在任何距离都没有观察到影响。田间研究表明,即使在最坏的情况下,通过喷雾漂移暴露于 IFT 的非目标陆生植物也可以通过 9.14 米缓冲区得到保护。2022 年《综合环境评估与管理》第 757-769 卷。©2021 拜耳。环境毒理化学学会(SETAC)旗下威利期刊公司出版的《综合环境评估与管理》刊登。