From the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales.
Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
J ECT. 2022 Mar 1;38(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000800.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to reported change in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) services worldwide. However, minimal data have been published demonstrating tangible changes across multiple ECT centers. This article aimed to examine changes in ECT patients and ECT service delivery during the pandemic.
We retrospectively assessed data collected on ECT patients within the Clinical Alliance and Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy and Related Treatments (CARE) Network during a 3-month period starting at the first COVID-19 restrictions in 2020 and compared data with predicted values based on the corresponding 3-month period in 2019. Mixed-effects repeated-measures analyses examined differences in the predicted and actual number of acute ECT courses started and the total number of acute ECT treatments given in 2020. Sociodemographic, clinical, treatment factors, and ECT service delivery factors were compared for 2020 and 2019.
Four Australian and 1 Singaporean site participated in the study. There were no significant differences between the predicted and actual number of acute ECT courses and total number of acute ECT treatments administered in 2020. During 2020, there were statistically significant increases in the proportion of patients requiring ECT under substitute consent and receiving ECT for urgent reasons compared with 2019.
This multisite empirical study is among the first that supports anecdotal reports of changes in the triaging and delivery of ECT during COVID-19. Results suggest that ECT was prioritized for the most severely ill patients. Further data assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on ECT are needed.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致全球报告的电休克治疗(ECT)服务发生变化。然而,发表的数据很少,无法证明多个 ECT 中心都发生了切实的变化。本文旨在研究大流行期间 ECT 患者和 ECT 服务提供方面的变化。
我们回顾性评估了 2020 年首次实施 COVID-19 限制措施后的 3 个月期间内,Clinical Alliance 和 Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy and Related Treatments(CARE)网络中 ECT 患者的数据,并将这些数据与 2019 年同期的预测值进行比较。混合效应重复测量分析检查了 2020 年预测和实际开始的急性 ECT 疗程数量以及实际给予的急性 ECT 治疗总数之间的差异。比较了 2020 年和 2019 年的社会人口统计学、临床、治疗因素和 ECT 服务提供因素。
4 个澳大利亚和 1 个新加坡的站点参与了该研究。2020 年预测和实际开始的急性 ECT 疗程数量以及实际给予的急性 ECT 治疗总数之间没有显著差异。与 2019 年相比,2020 年需要替代同意接受 ECT 和因紧急原因接受 ECT 的患者比例有统计学意义的增加。
这项多站点的实证研究是支持 COVID-19 期间 ECT 分诊和提供方式发生变化的传闻报道的首批研究之一。结果表明,ECT 优先用于病情最严重的患者。需要进一步的数据评估 COVID-19 对 ECT 的影响。