Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Nikon X-Tek Systems Ltd., Tring Business Centre, Tring, Hertfordshire, UK.
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):5884-5896. doi: 10.1002/mp.15162. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
In this work, an analytical model describing the noise in the retrieved three contrast channels, transmission, refraction, and ultra small-angle scattering, obtained with edge illumination X-ray phase-based imaging system is presented and compared to experimental data.
In EI, images acquired at different displacements of the presample mask (i.e., different illumination levels referred to as points on the "illumination curve"), followed by pixel-wise curve fitting, are exploited to quantitatively retrieve the three contrast channels. Therefore, the noise in the final image will depend on the error associated with the fitting process. We use a model based on the derivation of the standard error on fitted parameters, which relies on the calculation of the covariance matrix, to estimate the noise and the cross-channel correlation as a function of the position of the sampling points. In particular, we investigated the most common cases of 3 and 5 sampling points. In addition, simulations have been used to better understand the role of the integration time for each sampling point. Finally, the model is validated by comparison with the experimental data acquired with an edge illumination setup based on a tungsten rotating anode X-ray source and a photon counting detector.
We found a good match between the predictions of the model and the experimental data. In particular, for the investigated cases, an arrangement of the sampling points leading to minimum noise and cross-channel correlation can be found. Simulations revealed that, given a fixed overall scanning time, its distribution into the smallest possible number of sampling points needed for phase retrieval leads to minimum noise thanks to higher statistics per point.
This work presents an analytical model describing the noise in the various contrast channels retrieved in edge illumination as a function of the illumination curve sampling. In particular, an optimal sampling scheme leading to minimum noise has been determined for the case where 3 or 5 sampling points are used, which represent two of the most common acquisition schemes. In addition, the correlation between noise in the different channels and the role of the number of points and exposure time have been also investigated. In general, our results suggest a series of procedures that should be followed in order to optimize the experimental acquisitions.
在这项工作中,提出并比较了一种分析模型,用于描述边缘照明 X 射线相衬成像系统获得的透射、折射和超小角散射三种对比通道的噪声。
在 EI 中,利用在预采样掩模不同位移(即不同的照明水平,称为“照明曲线”上的点)处获得的图像,通过逐像素曲线拟合,定量地恢复三个对比通道。因此,最终图像中的噪声将取决于拟合过程中的误差。我们使用基于拟合参数标准误差推导的模型,该模型依赖于协方差矩阵的计算,以估计噪声和交叉通道相关性作为采样点位置的函数。特别是,我们研究了最常见的 3 个和 5 个采样点的情况。此外,还使用了模拟来更好地理解每个采样点的积分时间的作用。最后,通过与基于旋转钨靶 X 射线源和光子计数探测器的边缘照明设置获得的实验数据进行比较,验证了该模型。
我们发现模型的预测与实验数据之间有很好的匹配。特别是,在所研究的情况下,可以找到一种采样点排列方式,可实现最小噪声和交叉通道相关性。模拟结果表明,在固定的总扫描时间内,将其分配到相位恢复所需的最小可能数量的采样点中,由于每个点的统计数据更高,因此可以获得最小的噪声。
这项工作提出了一种分析模型,用于描述边缘照明中作为照明曲线采样函数的各种对比通道的噪声。特别是,已经确定了在使用 3 个或 5 个采样点的情况下(代表两种最常见的采集方案),可实现最小噪声的最佳采样方案。此外,还研究了不同通道之间的噪声相关性以及点数和曝光时间的作用。总的来说,我们的结果提出了一系列程序,应遵循这些程序以优化实验采集。