J Aging Phys Act. 2022 Feb 1;30(1):98-106. doi: 10.1123/japa.2020-0387. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
Neighborhood walkability has been associated with self-reported sedentary behavior (SB) and self-reported and objective physical activity. However, self-reported measures of SB are inaccurate and can lead to biased estimates, and few studies have examined how associations differ by gender and age. The authors examined the relationships between perceived neighborhood walkability measured with the Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale (scored 1.0-4.0) and device-based SB and physical activity in a cohort of community-dwelling older adults (N = 1,077). The authors fit linear regression models adjusting for device wear time, demographics, self-rated health, and accounting for probability of participation. The Higher Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale was associated with higher steps (+676 steps/point on the Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale, p = .001) and sit-to-stand transitions (+2.4 transitions/point, p = .018). Though not statistically significant, stratified analyses suggest an attenuation of effect for those aged 85 years and older and for women. Consistent with previous literature, neighborhood walkability was associated with more steps, though not with physical activity time. The neighborhood environment may also influence SB.
社区步行环境的便利性与自我报告的久坐行为(SB)和自我报告的以及客观的身体活动有关。然而,自我报告的 SB 测量不准确,可能导致有偏差的估计,而且很少有研究检查这些关联如何因性别和年龄而异。作者在一个社区居住的老年人队列中(N=1077),使用身体活动邻里环境量表(得分 1.0-4.0)测量感知的邻里步行环境,并与基于设备的 SB 和身体活动进行了线性回归模型拟合,调整了设备佩戴时间、人口统计学、自我评估的健康状况,并考虑了参与概率。较高的身体活动邻里环境量表与更多的步数(Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale 每增加 1 分,步数增加 676 步,p=0.001)和坐立转换次数(每增加 1 分,转换次数增加 2.4 次,p=0.018)有关。尽管没有统计学意义,但分层分析表明,85 岁及以上的老年人和女性的影响可能会减弱。与之前的文献一致,社区步行环境与更多的步数有关,但与身体活动时间无关。邻里环境也可能影响 SB。