Shtoyko Ashley N, Feldman Elizabeth A, Cwikla Gregory M, Darko William, Green G Randall, Seabury Robert W
Department of Pharmacy, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jan 1;79(1):e8-e13. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab331.
Thrombocytopenia can occur when using an Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD), and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is often suspected. Data on heparin- and anticoagulant-free purge solutions in these devices are limited. Previous case reports have described argatroban-based purge solutions, both with and without systemic argatroban, at varying concentrations in patients with known or suspected HIT.
A 33-year-old male was transferred to our institution and emergently initiated on life support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), an Impella pVAD, and continuous venovenous hemofiltration to receive an urgent aortic valve replacement. Over the next several days, the patient's platelet count declined with a nadir of 17 × 103/μL on hospital day 13. The patient's 4T score for probability of HIT was calculated as 4. All heparin products were discontinued on hospital day 15, and the patient was initiated on systemic infusion with argatroban 1,000 μg/mL at a rate of 0.2 μg/kg/min with a purge solution of argatroban 0.05 mg/mL. The systemic infusion remained at a rate of 0.2 μg/kg/min, and the total argatroban dose was, on average, less than 0.25 μg/kg/min. On hospital day 21, the patient was transferred to another institution.
Systemic infusion and a purge solution with argatroban were used in a patient with an Impella pVAD with multisystem organ dysfunction and suspected HIT. The patient achieved therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times without adjustment of the systemic argatroban infusion and did not experience bleeding or thrombosis. Further studies concerning the safety and effectiveness of argatroban-based purge solutions in patients with pVADs are needed.
使用Impella经皮心室辅助装置(pVAD)时可能会发生血小板减少症,肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)常被怀疑。关于这些装置中无肝素和抗凝剂的冲洗液的数据有限。既往病例报告描述了在已知或疑似HIT的患者中,使用不同浓度的基于阿加曲班的冲洗液,有的联合全身使用阿加曲班,有的未联合。
一名33岁男性被转至我院,紧急启动静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)、Impella pVAD和持续静脉-静脉血液滤过进行生命支持,以接受紧急主动脉瓣置换术。在接下来的几天里,患者的血小板计数下降,在住院第13天降至最低点,为17×10³/μL。计算患者HIT可能性的4T评分为4分。所有肝素产品在住院第15天停用,患者开始以0.2μg/kg/min的速率全身输注1000μg/mL的阿加曲班,并使用0.05mg/mL的阿加曲班冲洗液。全身输注速率保持在0.2μg/kg/min,阿加曲班的总剂量平均低于0.25μg/kg/min。住院第21天,患者转至另一机构。
一名患有Impella pVAD且有多系统器官功能障碍并疑似HIT的患者使用了阿加曲班进行全身输注和冲洗液治疗。患者在未调整全身阿加曲班输注的情况下达到了治疗性活化部分凝血活酶时间,且未发生出血或血栓形成。需要进一步研究基于阿加曲班的冲洗液在pVAD患者中的安全性和有效性。