Hunt Anne W, Allen Kay-Ann, Dittmann Katherine, Linkewich Elizabeth, Donald Michelle, Hutter Jennifer, Patel Alexandra, McEwen Sara
Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):201-207. doi: 10.1111/jep.13610. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
The objective of this research study was to explore site and clinician specific experiences, successes and challenges in implementing a complex intervention (cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach) to enhance stroke team's ability to address cognitive impairments as part of comprehensive stroke rehabilitation.
A focus group was held with clinicians from five study sites, all rehabilitation stroke hospitals in a large urban setting, to discuss implementation experiences. Participants were clinicians (site champions) from each of the five participating stroke program study sites and included four occupational therapists, three physiotherapists and one speech-language pathologist. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes that represented clinicians' perspectives.
Implementing this complex team-based intervention was influenced by three themes-organizational support, experiential evidence, and clinicians' perspectives. Continued implementation of the intervention following the withdrawal of study support was represented on a continuum that ranged from not using the approach at all to implementing it with all patients. Sites where managers encouraged and supported use of the intervention within teams (organization support), continued to use it after the study support period as did clinicians who were willing to try new interventions (clinicians' perspectives). Development of iterative conclusions through implementation or attempts to implement the intervention had both positive and negative effects on continued implementation (experiential evidence).
Strategies that reinforce development of positive experiential evidence and building organizational support for innovative practice were found to be useful adjuncts in facilitating implementation of complex interprofessional interventions.
本研究的目的是探索在实施一项复杂干预措施(日常职业表现认知取向方法)以提高卒中团队在综合卒中康复中应对认知障碍能力时,不同地点和临床医生的具体经验、成功之处及挑战。
与来自五个研究地点(均为大城市的康复卒中医院)的临床医生举行了一次焦点小组讨论,以探讨实施经验。参与者是来自五个参与卒中项目研究地点的临床医生(各地点负责人),包括四名职业治疗师、三名物理治疗师和一名言语语言病理学家。采用主题分析法来确定代表临床医生观点的主题。
实施这项基于团队的复杂干预措施受到三个主题的影响——组织支持、经验证据和临床医生的观点。在研究支持撤出后,干预措施的持续实施呈现出一个连续体,范围从根本不使用该方法到对所有患者实施该方法。在那些管理人员鼓励并支持在团队内部使用该干预措施的地点(组织支持),以及那些愿意尝试新干预措施的临床医生(临床医生的观点),在研究支持期结束后仍继续使用该措施。通过实施或尝试实施干预措施得出的迭代结论对持续实施既有积极影响也有消极影响(经验证据)。
强化积极经验证据的发展以及为创新实践建立组织支持的策略,被发现是促进复杂跨专业干预措施实施的有用辅助手段。