Han Michael M, Hsueh Jessica, Chen Andrew X, Greenlee Tyler E, Conti Thais F, Rose Susannah L, Singh Rishi P, Rachitskaya Aleksandra V
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 9;8:23743735211033750. doi: 10.1177/23743735211033750. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of the current study is to examine how nonmodifiable sociodemographic, disease, appointment, management, and survey factors correlate with provider rating. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted on 29 857 patient Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys collected from January 2017 to January 2019 at a tertiary eye center. We included surveys of patients aged 18 years or older, who answered at least 4 of 6 subfield questions, and completed the survey within 90 days of the appointment. The main outcome was the odds of receiving top box score (TBS) of 10/10 on the survey question regarding overall provider rating. The results showed that the variables with higher odds of TBS included higher overall appointment attendance (odds ratio [OR]: 2.66 [95% CI: 1.23-5.75], = .013); older patient age (OR 2.44 [95% CI: 2.08-2.87], < .001]; higher percentage of survey questions completed (OR: 2.02 [95% CI: 1.79-2.27], < .001); better best corrected visual acuity (OR: 1.85 [95% CI: 1.3-2.64], = .001); optometry clinic visit (OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.15-1.36], < .001); having procedures (OR: 1.19 [95% CI: 1.04-1.36], = .013), surgery scheduled (OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.03-1.36], = .020], or refraction done (OR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.08-1.25], < .001); being seen by male providers (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.04-1.17], = .001); and having additional eye testing performed (OR: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.00-1.13], = .048). Variables associated with lower odds of TBS included longer time to complete survey (OR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.3-0.58], = .001); new patient encounter (OR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.58-0.65], < .001); and glaucoma (OR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.59-0.75], < .001), cornea (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.71-0.87], < .001), or comprehensive clinic visits (OR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.79-0.94], < .001). Thus, nonmodifiable factors may affect the provider rating, and these factors should be studied further and accounted for when interpreting the results of patient experience surveys.
本研究的目的是探讨不可改变的社会人口统计学、疾病、就诊、管理和调查因素如何与医疗服务提供者评分相关。这是一项回顾性横断面研究,对2017年1月至2019年1月在一家三级眼科中心收集的29857份患者对医疗服务提供者和系统的临床医生及团体消费者评估调查进行了分析。我们纳入了年龄在18岁及以上、回答了6个亚领域问题中至少4个且在就诊后90天内完成调查的患者的调查。主要结果是在关于医疗服务提供者总体评分的调查问题上获得10分满分的最高评分(TBS)的几率。结果显示,TBS几率较高的变量包括更高的总体就诊出勤率(优势比[OR]:2.66[95%置信区间:1.23 - 5.75],P = 0.013);患者年龄较大(OR 2.44[95%置信区间:2.08 - 2.87],P < 0.001);完成调查问题的百分比更高(OR:2.02[95%置信区间:1.79 - 2.27],P < 0.001);最佳矫正视力更好(OR:1.85[95%置信区间:1.3 - 2.64],P = 0.001);验光门诊就诊(OR:1.25[95%置信区间:1.15 - 1.36],P < 0.001);进行过手术(OR:1.19[95%置信区间:1.