Suppr超能文献

骨内区域性预防性抗生素可降低初次全膝关节置换术后假体关节感染的风险:一项多中心研究。

Intraosseous Regional Prophylactic Antibiotics Decrease the Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary TKA: A Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Australia.

The Orthopaedic Research Institute of Queensland, Townsville, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Nov 1;479(11):2504-2512. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001919.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that the administration of regional prophylactic antibiotics by intraosseous (IO) injection achieves tissue concentrations around the knee that are 10- to 15-fold higher than intravenous (IV) delivery of prophylactic antibiotics. It is currently unknown whether the use of regional prophylactic antibiotics for primary TKA would result in a lower risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI).

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is IO injection of prophylactic antibiotics associated with a decreased risk of early (< 12 months) deep PJI compared with traditional IV prophylactic antibiotics? (2) What other patient factors are associated with an increased risk of early PJI after TKA, and do regional prophylactic antibiotics influence these risk factors? (3) Can IO antibiotics be administered to all patients, and what complications occurred from the delivery of IO prophylactic antibiotics?

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of all primary TKAs (1909 TKAs) over a 5-year period (January 2013 to December 2017) was performed to determine the risk of early PJI. Three primary TKAs did not meet the study inclusion criteria and were excluded from the study, leaving a total of 1906 TKAs (725 IO, 1181 IV) for analysis at a minimum of 12 months after index procedure. Both cohorts exhibited similar ages, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades; however, a greater proportion of patients in the IO cohort were smokers (p = 0.01), while a greater proportion of patients were diabetic in the IV cohort (p = 0.006). The PJI risk between IO and IV delivery techniques was compared while adjusting for patient demographics and medical comorbidities. Complications related to IO delivery-inability to administer via IO technique, compartment syndrome, fat embolism, and red man syndrome with vancomycin use-were recorded.

RESULTS

The delivery of regional prophylactic antibiotics by the IO technique resulted in a lower PJI risk than IV prophylactic antibiotics (0.1% [1 of 725] compared with 1.4% [16 of 1181]; relative risk 0.10 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.77]; p = 0.03). BMI (β = -0.17; standard error = 0.08; p = 0.02), diabetes (β = -1.80; standard error = 0.75; p = 0.02), and renal failure (β = -2.37; standard error = 0.84; p = 0.01) were factors associated with of PJI, while smoking, sex, and ASA score were not contributing factors (p > 0.05). Although BMI, diabetes, and renal failure were identified as infection risk factors, the use of IO antibiotics in these patients did not result in a lower PJI risk compared with IV antibiotics (p > 0.05). IO antibiotics were able to be successfully administered to all patients in this cohort, and there were no complications related to the delivery of IO antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should consider administering regional prophylactic antibiotics in primary TKA to reduce the risk of early PJI. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy of regional prophylactic antibiotics in reducing the PJI risk in primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

最近的研究表明,通过骨髓腔内(IO)注射给予局部预防性抗生素可使膝关节周围的组织浓度达到静脉(IV)预防性抗生素给药的 10-15 倍。目前尚不清楚在初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中使用局部预防性抗生素是否会降低假体关节感染(PJI)的风险。

问题/目的:(1)与传统的 IV 预防性抗生素相比,IO 注射预防性抗生素是否与早期(<12 个月)深部 PJI 风险降低相关?(2)哪些其他患者因素与 TKA 后早期 PJI 的风险增加相关,局部预防性抗生素是否会影响这些风险因素?(3)IO 抗生素是否可以用于所有患者,以及 IO 预防性抗生素给药会出现哪些并发症?

方法

对 5 年内(2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月)所有初次 TKA(1909 例 TKA)进行回顾性比较研究,以确定早期 PJI 的风险。3 例初次 TKA 不符合研究纳入标准,从研究中排除,在索引手术后至少 12 个月对 1906 例 TKA(725 例 IO,1181 例 IV)进行分析。两个队列在年龄、BMI 和美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分级方面表现出相似的特征;然而,IO 队列中更多的患者是吸烟者(p = 0.01),而 IV 队列中更多的患者是糖尿病患者(p = 0.006)。在调整患者人口统计学和合并症后,比较 IO 和 IV 给药技术之间的 PJI 风险。记录与 IO 给药相关的并发症-无法通过 IO 技术给药、间隔综合征、脂肪栓塞和万古霉素使用时的红人综合征。

结果

与 IV 预防性抗生素相比,IO 技术局部预防性抗生素的给药可降低 PJI 风险(0.1% [725 例中的 1 例] 与 1.4% [1181 例中的 16 例];相对风险 0.10 [95%CI 0.01 至 0.77];p = 0.03)。BMI(β = -0.17;标准误差 = 0.08;p = 0.02)、糖尿病(β = -1.80;标准误差 = 0.75;p = 0.02)和肾功能衰竭(β = -2.37;标准误差 = 0.84;p = 0.01)是与 PJI 相关的因素,而吸烟、性别和 ASA 评分不是致病因素(p > 0.05)。尽管 BMI、糖尿病和肾功能衰竭被确定为感染危险因素,但与 IV 抗生素相比,在这些患者中使用 IO 抗生素并未降低 PJI 风险(p > 0.05)。IO 抗生素能够成功地用于该队列中的所有患者,并且与 IO 抗生素给药相关的并发症。

结论

外科医生应考虑在初次 TKA 中给予局部预防性抗生素,以降低早期 PJI 的风险。需要未来的随机前瞻性临床试验来验证局部预防性抗生素在降低初次 TKA 中 PJI 风险方面的疗效。

证据等级

III 级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

1
Intraosseous Regional Prophylactic Antibiotics Decrease the Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary TKA: A Multicenter Study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Nov 1;479(11):2504-2512. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001919.
3
Low Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Intraosseous Vancomycin.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S305-S309. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Safety and effectiveness of intraosseous regional prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4233-4245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05513-0. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
6
Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr;38(4):769-774. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.023. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
9
Regional Intraosseous Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics is More Effective Than Systemic Administration in a Mouse Model of TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3573-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4464-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Intraosseous Versus Intravenous Vancomycin in Tourniquetless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S224-S228. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.083. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

2
Periprosthetic joint infections: navigating innovations and potential translation.
Bone Joint Res. 2025 Jan 21;14(1):42-45. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.141.BJR-2024-0295.R1.
3
Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 18;145(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05627-5.
4
Intraosseous regional antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA): Systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Oct 3;57:102553. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102553. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Safety and effectiveness of intraosseous regional prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4233-4245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05513-0. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
6
7
Prolonged efficacy of cefazolin in intraosseous regional prophylaxis for total knee arthroplasty: a rabbit model study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 1;25(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07238-y.
8
Higher cefazolin concentrations in synovial fluid with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4069-4075. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05108-1. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验