• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于评分的决策与临床医生在口腔癌手术中是否需要行气管切开术方面的决策的一致性程度:一项回顾性分析。

The degree of agreement between score-based decision and clinician's discretion regarding the need for tracheotomy in oral cancer surgery: A retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 30;100(30):e26712. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026712.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000026712
PMID:34397703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8322477/
Abstract

In oral cancer surgery, the decision to perform a tracheotomy is often determined by the surgeon. In this study, we investigated the competency of clinical scoring systems in identifying patients who require tracheotomy and examined the degree of agreement between the surgeon's decision and the indications of various scoring systems. We identified 110 patients who were surgically treated for oral cancer. Of these, 67 patients (44 men and 23 women) who underwent resection and reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. To derive the score, we evaluated the endpoint of the airway management score using clinical records and images. We divided the patients into two groups based on the Cameron and Gupta scores (tracheotomy and no-tracheotomy groups) and evaluated the degree of agreement with the surgeon's decision by calculating the κ coefficient. The κ coefficients of the Gupta and Cameron scores were 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.82) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.38-0.82), respectively. The clinical evaluation of the κ coefficient indicated that the Cameron and Gupta scores agreed fairly with the surgeon's decision. In this study, the Cameron and Gupta scores fairly agreed with the decision of experienced surgeons and were confirmed as acceptable guides for making clinical judgments.

摘要

在口腔癌手术中,是否进行气管切开术的决策通常由外科医生决定。在这项研究中,我们调查了临床评分系统在识别需要气管切开术的患者方面的能力,并研究了外科医生的决策与各种评分系统的指征之间的一致性程度。我们确定了 110 名接受口腔癌手术治疗的患者。其中,对 67 名(44 名男性和 23 名女性)接受切除术和重建术的患者进行了回顾性分析。为了得出评分,我们使用临床记录和图像评估了气道管理评分的终点。我们根据 Cameron 和 Gupta 评分(气管切开术组和非气管切开术组)将患者分为两组,并通过计算κ系数评估与外科医生决策的一致性程度。Gupta 和 Cameron 评分的κ系数分别为 0.61(95%置信区间:0.40-0.82)和 0.60(95%置信区间:0.38-0.82)。κ系数的临床评估表明,Cameron 和 Gupta 评分与外科医生的决策相当一致。在这项研究中,Cameron 和 Gupta 评分与经验丰富的外科医生的决策相当一致,被确认为做出临床判断的可接受指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/067c/8322477/270c24636097/medi-100-e26712-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/067c/8322477/270c24636097/medi-100-e26712-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/067c/8322477/270c24636097/medi-100-e26712-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The degree of agreement between score-based decision and clinician's discretion regarding the need for tracheotomy in oral cancer surgery: A retrospective analysis.基于评分的决策与临床医生在口腔癌手术中是否需要行气管切开术方面的决策的一致性程度:一项回顾性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 30;100(30):e26712. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026712.
2
Evaluation of Scoring Systems for Airway Management After Oral Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.口腔癌手术后气道管理评分系统的评估:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 Aug;130(8):873-880. doi: 10.1177/0003489420984353. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
[Usefulness of the Cameron tracheostomy scoring system after oral tumor surgery].[口腔肿瘤手术后卡梅伦气管切开术评分系统的实用性]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2014 Aug-Sep;61(7):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
4
Analysis of Risk Factors for Pneumonia in 482 Patients Undergoing Oral Cancer Surgery With Tracheotomy.482例行口腔癌手术并气管切开患者肺炎危险因素分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):415-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
5
Airway management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer: delayed extubation as an alternative to routine tracheotomy.头颈部癌症患者行游离组织微血管吻合术后的气道管理:延迟拔管替代常规气管切开术。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Mar 7;144:w13941. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13941.
6
Predictive Nomogram for the Necessity of Tracheotomy During Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer Surgery.口腔和口咽癌手术中气管切开术必要性的预测列线图。
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):E1489-E1495. doi: 10.1002/lary.29121. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Efficacy of tracheostomy for respiratory management in patients with advanced oral cancer.气管切开术在晚期口腔癌患者呼吸管理中的疗效
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jul 22;46(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00439-4.
8
Are Tracheotomies Required for Patients Undergoing Composite Mandibular Resections for Oral Cancer?口腔癌患者行下颌骨复合切除术时是否需要气管切开术?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;78(8):1427-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Association of Airway Complications With Free Tissue Transfer to the Upper Aerodigestive Tract With or Without Tracheotomy.气道并发症与是否行气管切开术的联合对上气道-消化道游离组织转移的影响。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 1;142(12):1177-1183. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2002.
10
Airway management after maxillectomy with free flap reconstruction.游离皮瓣重建术后的上颌骨切除术后气道管理。
Head Neck. 2013 Aug;35(8):1061-5. doi: 10.1002/hed.23082. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of tracheostomy for respiratory management in patients with advanced oral cancer.气管切开术在晚期口腔癌患者呼吸管理中的疗效
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jul 22;46(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00439-4.