Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biruni University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 13;100(32):e26816. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026816.
All of the injuries were the open injuries with bone or tendon structures in the hand and wrist region as a result of the firearm injury (FI) in the Syria. In the study, we assessed the outcomes of the posterior interosseous flap (PIF) on hand and wrist that we used for the Syrian injured people including civilians and soldiers in this War. PIF was applied to 77 patients who composed of 43 female and 34 male that all patients were evaluated for tissue loss resulting from gunshot wounds and injured in the War between 2014 and 2020 years with tissue loss in hand and wrist as a result of FI. The flap survival rate was 100% for all the patients. The dimensions of flaps ranged from 4.1 cm × 2.2 cm to 9cm × 5.4 cm with 0.51 ± 0.12 cm thickness. The mean pedicle length was 6.33 ± 1.08 cm. The surgery for PIF took 68.8 ± 22.1 minutes, while blood loss was 60 ± 24 mL. We observed no palsy conditions including the posterior interosseous nerve. The donor sites were treated by primary intention in the patients. We found the superiority of PIF with the postoperative follow-up comfort, ease of fracture healing, easy and fast, easy-to-apply method and no second additional session requirement in FI patients. We did not detect flap necrosis in any patient or observe a flap-related complication. As a result of the present study, it strongly supports the thesis that PIF is the best option in these cases.
所有损伤都是开放性损伤,手部和腕部有骨或肌腱结构,这是由于叙利亚的火器伤(FI)造成的。在研究中,我们评估了我们用于治疗叙利亚受伤人员(包括平民和士兵)的后骨间皮瓣(PIF)在手和腕部的结果。在 2014 年至 2020 年期间的战争中,由于 FI 导致手部和腕部组织缺失而受伤的所有患者中,应用 PIF 治疗了 77 例患者,其中 43 例为女性,34 例为男性。所有患者均评估了因枪伤导致的组织缺失,并且在 2014 年至 2020 年期间的战争中因 FI 导致手部和腕部组织缺失。所有患者的皮瓣存活率均为 100%。皮瓣的尺寸范围为 4.1×2.2cm 至 9×5.4cm,厚度为 0.51±0.12cm。皮瓣蒂的平均长度为 6.33±1.08cm。PIF 手术时间为 68.8±22.1 分钟,失血量为 60±24mL。我们没有观察到任何神经麻痹,包括后骨间神经。患者的供区均行一期缝合。我们发现 PIF 在 FI 患者中具有优势,包括术后随访舒适、骨折愈合容易、简便、易于应用且无需第二次额外治疗。我们没有发现任何患者的皮瓣坏死或观察到皮瓣相关并发症。基于本研究,它强烈支持这样一个观点,即在这些情况下,PIF 是最佳选择。