Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1924-1935. doi: 10.1111/hex.13344. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care.
Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care.
A scoping review of recent peer-reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL-EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient-centredness, empowerment, shared decision-making and partnership in care.
Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision-making and patient-centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient-centredness, empowerment and shared decision-making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase.
There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time.
This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
患者参与医疗照护是重点,也是临床实践的关键组成部分。已经引入了不同的护理方法来促进患者的参与。目前缺乏对评估与患者参与医疗照护相关的主要概念和维度的工具的最新综述。
我们的范围综述旨在绘制和总结最近验证的用于评估各种患者参与医疗照护的概念和维度的工具。
在四个数据库(Ovid Medline、Ovid EMBASE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、CINAHL-EBSCO)中进行了一项关于描述评估患者对参与医疗照护的偏好和体验的工具的近期同行评审文章的范围综述。我们采用了一个基于患者参与医疗照护的主要概念的广义定义:以患者为中心、赋权、共同决策和护理伙伴关系。
在 2161 篇文章中,有 16 篇文章,每篇文章都描述了一种不同的工具,被纳入并进行了分析。共同决策和以患者为中心是评估的两个主要概念,在大多数工具中通常同时进行评估。只有四个量表同时衡量以患者为中心、赋权和共同决策,但没有工具衡量护理伙伴关系的核心维度。大多数工具在开发或验证过程中没有让患者参与,或者只是在验证阶段咨询了患者。
没有一个工具是从开发到验证都与患者共同构建的,无法同时用于评估患者参与医疗照护的主要概念和维度。
本文由一名患者专家(也是作者之一)协助完成。患者专家、合作伙伴关系与公众卓越中心的联合主任 Vincent Dumez 对本文的准备工作做出了贡献。