• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与患者合作参与医疗保健研究:伦理问题、挑战及实践建议的范围综述。

Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.

机构信息

Department of Management, HEC Montreal, 3000 chemin de la Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T2A7, Canada.

University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 11;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0460-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-020-0460-0
PMID:32393230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Partnering with patients in healthcare research now benefits from a strong rationale and is encouraged by funding agencies and research institutions. However, this new approach raises ethical issues for patients, researchers, research professionals and administrators. The main objective of this review is to map the literature related to the ethical issues associated with patient partnership in healthcare research, as well as the recommendations to address them. Our global aim is to help researchers, patients, research institutions and research ethics boards reflecting on and dealing with these issues.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the ethical issues and recommendations associated with partnering with patients in healthcare research. After our search strategy, 31 peer reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2017 remained and were analyzed.

RESULTS

We have identified 58 first-order ethical issues and challenges associated with patient partnership in research, regrouped in 18 second-order ethical themes. Most of the issues are transversal to all phases and stages of the research process and a lot of them could also apply to patient-partnership in other spheres of health, such as governance, quality improvement, and education. We suggested that ethical issues and challenges of partnered research can be related to four ethical frameworks: 1) Research ethics; 2) Research integrity; 3) Organizational ethics, and 4) Relational ethics.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified numerous ethical issues associated with the recent approach of patient-partnership in research. These issues are more diverse than the issues associated with a more traditional research approach. Indeed, the current discussion on how we address ethical issues in research is anchored in the assumption that patients, as research participants, must be protected from risk. However, doing research with, and not on, the patient involves changes in the way we reflect on the ethical issues associated with this approach to research. We propose to broaden the ethical discussion on partnered research to not only rely on a research ethics framework, but to also frame it within the areas of research integrity, organizational ethics and relational ethics.

摘要

背景

如今,在医疗保健研究中与患者合作有其充分的理由,并得到了资助机构和研究机构的鼓励。然而,这种新方法给患者、研究人员、研究专业人员和管理人员带来了伦理问题。本综述的主要目的是绘制与医疗保健研究中患者合作相关的伦理问题的文献,并提出解决这些问题的建议。我们的总体目标是帮助研究人员、患者、研究机构和研究伦理委员会思考和处理这些问题。

方法

我们对与医疗保健研究中的患者合作相关的伦理问题和建议进行了范围界定审查。在我们的搜索策略之后,2007 年至 2017 年间发表的 31 篇同行评审文章仍然存在,并进行了分析。

结果

我们确定了 58 个与研究中的患者合作相关的第一级伦理问题和挑战,这些问题被归为 18 个第二级伦理主题。大多数问题贯穿研究过程的所有阶段和阶段,其中许多问题也可能适用于医疗保健领域的其他领域,如治理、质量改进和教育。我们认为,合作研究的伦理问题和挑战可以与四个伦理框架相关联:1)研究伦理;2)研究诚信;3)组织伦理;4)关系伦理。

结论

我们已经确定了与研究中患者合作的新方法相关的许多伦理问题。这些问题比与更传统的研究方法相关的问题更加多样化。事实上,目前关于我们如何解决研究中的伦理问题的讨论是以这样一种假设为基础的,即作为研究参与者的患者必须免受风险的影响。然而,与患者一起开展研究而不是针对患者进行研究,这涉及到我们对这种研究方法相关伦理问题的反思方式的改变。我们建议将关于合作研究的伦理讨论扩大到不仅依赖于研究伦理框架,而且还将其纳入研究诚信、组织伦理和关系伦理领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/e905adcf168e/12910_2020_460_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/389d8c88ce24/12910_2020_460_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/47baf43a382b/12910_2020_460_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/a5ce9429db7c/12910_2020_460_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/e905adcf168e/12910_2020_460_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/389d8c88ce24/12910_2020_460_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/47baf43a382b/12910_2020_460_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/a5ce9429db7c/12910_2020_460_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562f/7216517/e905adcf168e/12910_2020_460_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.与患者合作参与医疗保健研究:伦理问题、挑战及实践建议的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 11;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0460-0.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Exploring Ethical Issues Related to Patient Engagement in Healthcare: Patient, Clinician and Researcher's Perspectives.探讨与患者参与医疗保健相关的伦理问题:患者、临床医生和研究人员的观点。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Jun;16(2):237-248. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09904-6. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
A scoping review of the ethics frameworks describing issues related to the use of extended reality.一项关于描述与扩展现实使用相关问题的伦理框架的范围综述。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Feb 10;4:74. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.17283.2. eCollection 2024.
6
Ethics framework for citizen science and public and patient participation in research.公民科学和公众及患者参与研究的伦理框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 13;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00761-4.
7
Ethics challenges and guidance related to research involving adolescent post-abortion care: a scoping review.涉及青少年流产后护理的研究相关的伦理挑战和指导:范围综述。
Reprod Health. 2018 May 2;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0515-6.
8
Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review.营养相关公共卫生政策与干预措施制定及实施中的伦理问题:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186897. eCollection 2017.
9
Qualitative research ethics on the spot: Not only on the desktop.现场的定性研究伦理:不仅仅是在案头工作中。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Jun;23(4):455-64. doi: 10.1177/0969733014567023. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review.从关系伦理视角看以患者为中心的护理,以提供高质量和安全的医疗保健:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;8:44. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The role and contribution of experts by experience in building research capacity in adult social care services: findings from the script study.经验丰富的专家在成人社会护理服务研究能力建设中的作用与贡献:脚本研究的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 25;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00779-z.
2
Patient and Public Involvement with Forced Migrants: An Empirical Exploration of Ethical Issues.患者及公众与被迫移民的参与:伦理问题的实证探索
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10438-3.
3
Doing community involvement care-fully: using an ethic of care to guide involvement in research on women's health after pregnancy complications and loss.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Impact of Patient-Engaged Research: How a Methods Workshop Identified Critical Outcomes of Research Engagement.衡量患者参与研究的影响:一个方法研讨会如何确定研究参与的关键成果。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Nov 6;4(4):237-246. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1458. eCollection 2017 Fall.
2
Early-career researchers' views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research.早期职业研究人员对患者参与研究的伦理维度的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 7;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0260-y.
3
Enhancing patients' autonomy by involving them in research ethics committees.
谨慎地开展社区参与:运用关怀伦理指导对妊娠并发症及流产后女性健康研究的参与。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 6;11(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00771-7.
4
Landscape of informed consent practices and challenges in point-of-care clinical trials.即时医疗临床试验中知情同意实践与挑战的概况
Learn Health Syst. 2025 Mar 3;9(3):e10467. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10467. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
How are patient partners involved in health service research? A scoping review of reviews.患者合作伙伴如何参与卫生服务研究?一项综述的范围界定综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 8;11(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00755-7.
6
Health researchers' experience collaborating with patient partners: a qualitative study.健康研究人员与患者合作伙伴合作的经验:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00730-2.
7
A Qualitative Study of the Ethics of Community Scientists' Role in Environmental Health Research from the Perspective of Community Scientists and Institutional Review Board Staff.从社区科学家和机构审查委员会工作人员的角度对社区科学家在环境卫生研究中的角色伦理进行的定性研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 May;133(5):57019. doi: 10.1289/EHP15824. Epub 2025 May 23.
8
Navigating Loss and Growth in Chronic Illness: An Interview Study on Physical Activity and Well-Being.慢性病中的失落与成长:一项关于身体活动与幸福感的访谈研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Jun;39(2):e70028. doi: 10.1111/scs.70028.
9
Counseling and disclosure practices in predictive Alzheimer's disease diagnostics: A scoping review.预测性阿尔茨海默病诊断中的咨询与信息披露实践:一项范围综述
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Dec;20(12):8910-8936. doi: 10.1002/alz.14365. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
10
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.在儿科人群中开展以患者为导向的研究:一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;11(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/children11101266.
让患者参与研究伦理委员会以增强其自主权。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Nov 1;29(7):896-900. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx128.
4
Questioning patient engagement: research scientists' perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network.对患者参与度的质疑:研究科学家对心血管研究网络中患者参与挑战的看法。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 13;11:1573-1583. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S135457. eCollection 2017.
5
How are PCORI-funded researchers engaging patients in research and what are the ethical implications?患者为中心的结果研究所(PCORI)资助的研究人员如何让患者参与研究,以及其中的伦理意义是什么?
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1206045. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Nurse leaders' role in medical assistance in dying: A relational ethics approach.护士在协助死亡中的角色:一种关系伦理方法。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Jun;26(4):993-999. doi: 10.1177/0969733017730684. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
7
Patient and Researcher Engagement in Health Research: A Parent's Perspective.患者与研究者参与健康研究:一位家长的视角
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4127.
8
When Patient Engagement and Research Ethics Collide: Lessons from a Dementia Forum.当患者参与和研究伦理发生冲突时:来自痴呆症论坛的教训
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(1):1-10. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161285.
9
Institutional review board training when patients and community members are engaged as researchers.当患者和社区成员作为研究人员参与时的机构审查委员会培训。
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):301-304. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw112.
10
Opportunities for Engaging Patients in Kidney Research.让患者参与肾脏研究的机会。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017 Apr 12;4:2054358117703070. doi: 10.1177/2054358117703070. eCollection 2017.