• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国家橄榄球联盟和全国大学生体育协会比赛中现场观众人数有限与县级新冠病例的关联。

Association of Limited In-Person Attendance in US National Football League and National Collegiate Athletic Association Games With County-Level COVID-19 Cases.

机构信息

Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19621.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19621
PMID:34402891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8371570/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In 2020 and early 2021, the National Football League (NFL) and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) opted to host football games in stadiums across the country. The in-person attendance of games varied with time and from county to county. There is currently no evidence on whether limited in-person attendance of games is associated with COVID-19 case numbers on a county-level.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether NFL and NCAA football games with limited in-person attendance were associated with increased COVID-19 cases in the counties they were held compared with a matched set of counties.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this time-series cross-sectional study, every county hosting NFL or NCAA games with in-person attendance (treated group) in 2020 and 2021 was matched with a county that that did not host a game on the corresponding day but had an identical game history for up to 14 days prior (control group). A standard matching method was used to further refine this matched set so that the treated and matched control counties had similar population size, nonpharmaceutical interventions in place, and COVID-19 trends. The association of hosting games with in-person attendance with COVID-19 cases was assessed using a difference-in-difference estimator. Data were analyzed from August 29 to December 28, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Hosting NFL or NCAA games.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was estimation of new COVID-19 cases per 100 000 residents at the county level reported up to 14 days after a game among counties with NFL and NCAA games with in-person attendance.

RESULTS

A total of 528 games with in-person attendance (101 NFL games [19.1%]; 427 NCAA games [80.9%]) were included. The matching algorithm returned 361 matching sets of counties. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) number of attendance for NFL games was 9949 (6000 to 13 797) people. The median number of attendance for NCAA games was not available, and attendance was recorded as a binary variable. The median (IQR) daily new COVID-19 cases in treatment group counties hosting games was 26.14 (10.77-50.25) cases per 100 000 residents on game day. The median (IQR) daily new COVID-19 cases in control group counties where no games were played was 24.11 (9.64-48.55) cases per 100 000 residents on game day. The treatment effect size ranged from -5.17 to 4.72, with a mean (SD) of 1.21 (2.67) cases per 100 000 residents, within the 14-day period in all counties hosting the games, and the daily treatment effect trend remained relatively steady during this period.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study did not find a consistent increase in the daily COVID-19 cases per 100 000 residents in counties where NFL and NCAA games were held with limited in-person attendance. These findings suggest that NFL and NCAA football games hosted with limited in-person attendance were not associated with substantial risk for increased local COVID-19 cases.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/b97e2f43e161/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/affa7ba46f04/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/7f5f7d600e73/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/b97e2f43e161/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/affa7ba46f04/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/7f5f7d600e73/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be27/8371570/b97e2f43e161/jamanetwopen-e2119621-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

2020 年和 2021 年初,美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)和全国大学生体育协会(NCAA)选择在全美各地的体育场举办足球比赛。比赛的现场观众人数随时间和县城而变化。目前尚无证据表明有限的现场观众人数与县级的 COVID-19 病例数有关。

目的

评估 NFL 和 NCAA 有现场观众的足球比赛是否与比赛所在县的 COVID-19 病例数增加有关,而不是与一组匹配的县相比。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项时间序列的病例对照研究中,2020 年和 2021 年有现场观众的 NFL 或 NCAA 比赛(治疗组)的每个县都与当天没有比赛但在之前最多 14 天内有相同比赛历史的县(对照组)相匹配。使用标准匹配方法进一步完善了匹配组,以使治疗组和匹配对照组的县具有相似的人口规模、非药物干预措施和 COVID-19 趋势。使用差异差异估计来评估举办有现场观众的比赛与 COVID-19 病例之间的关联。数据于 2020 年 8 月 29 日至 12 月 28 日进行分析。

暴露情况

举办 NFL 或 NCAA 比赛。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是在有现场观众的 NFL 和 NCAA 比赛后的 14 天内,报告的每 100000 名居民中 COVID-19 新病例的估计数,在有现场观众的县。

结果

共纳入 528 场有现场观众的比赛(101 场 NFL 比赛[19.1%];427 场 NCAA 比赛[80.9%])。匹配算法返回了 361 组匹配的县。NFL 比赛的平均(四分位距 [IQR])出席人数为 9949 人(6000 至 13797 人)。NCAA 比赛的出席人数中位数(IQR)无法获得,出席人数被记录为二进制变量。治疗组县举办比赛当天的每日新 COVID-19 病例中位数(IQR)为 26.14(10.77-50.25)例/每 100000 名居民。对照组县当天没有比赛,新的 COVID-19 病例中位数(IQR)为 24.11(9.64-48.55)例/每 100000 名居民。所有举办比赛的县在 14 天内的治疗效果大小范围为-5.17 至 4.72,平均(SD)为每 100000 名居民 1.21(2.67)例,在此期间,每日治疗效果趋势相对稳定。

结论和相关性

这项病例对照研究没有发现参加有限现场观众的 NFL 和 NCAA 足球比赛的县 COVID-19 每日病例数持续增加。这些发现表明,举办有限现场观众的 NFL 和 NCAA 足球比赛与当地 COVID-19 病例数的显著增加无关。

相似文献

1
Association of Limited In-Person Attendance in US National Football League and National Collegiate Athletic Association Games With County-Level COVID-19 Cases.美国国家橄榄球联盟和全国大学生体育协会比赛中现场观众人数有限与县级新冠病例的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19621.
2
Association of National Football League Fan Attendance With County-Level COVID-19 Incidence in the 2020-2021 Season.2020-2021 赛季全美职业橄榄球大联盟球迷上座率与县一级新冠病毒感染率的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240132. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40132.
3
Association of In-person vs Virtual Education With Community COVID-19 Case Incidence Following School Reopenings in the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠大流行第一年学校复课后,面对面教育与虚拟教育与社区新冠病例发生率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238300. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8300.
4
Historical Patterns and Variation in Treatment of Injuries in NFL (National Football League) Players and NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) Division I Football Players.美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)球员和美国大学体育协会第一分区(NCAA)橄榄球运动员损伤治疗的历史模式与差异
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Sep/Oct;45(6):E319-E327.
5
Emergency medical care for spectators attending National Football League games.为观看美国国家橄榄球联盟比赛的观众提供的紧急医疗护理。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997 Jul-Sep;1(3):149-55. doi: 10.1080/10903129708958809.
6
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Test Positivity in NCAA Division I Student Athletes vs Nonathletes at 12 Institutions.12 所院校中美国全国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联赛学生运动员与非运动员的 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性率比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147805. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47805.
7
Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in the United States: Insights From the National Football League Occupational Health Program.优化美国的 SARS-CoV-2 监测:来自美国国家橄榄球联盟职业健康计划的见解。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug;174(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.7326/M21-0319. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
8
National Football League (NFL) quarterbacks who were multisport high school athletes have better in-season performance statistics and career success.美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)的高中时从事过多项运动的四分卫在赛季中的表现数据和职业成就上表现更好。
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Aug;51(4):320-324. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2075244. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Association Between Playing American Football in the National Football League and Long-term Mortality.美式橄榄球大联盟比赛与长期死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):800-806. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0140.
10
Anatomy of an American football game: Player-to-player contact before, during and after an NFL game in context of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.美式橄榄球比赛的剖析:2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间,NFL 比赛前后球员间的身体接触。
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Jun;51(3):234-239. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2028536. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Academic and healthcare efforts from Cessation to complete resumption of professional football tournaments during COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.新冠疫情期间从停止到完全恢复职业足球赛事的学术及医疗举措:一项叙述性综述
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 18;9(12):e22519. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22519. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Association of National Football League Fan Attendance With County-Level COVID-19 Incidence in the 2020-2021 Season.2020-2021 赛季全美职业橄榄球大联盟球迷上座率与县一级新冠病毒感染率的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240132. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40132.
3
Quantifying the impact of the Tokyo Olympics on COVID-19 cases using synthetic control methods.

本文引用的文献

1
Mass gathering events and reducing further global spread of COVID-19: a political and public health dilemma.大规模聚集活动与减少新冠病毒病的进一步全球传播:政治与公共卫生困境
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1096-1099. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30681-4. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.一个基于网络的交互式仪表盘,用于实时追踪新冠病毒。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward.
运用合成控制法量化东京奥运会对新冠病例的影响。
J Jpn Int Econ. 2022 Dec;66:101228. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2022.101228. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
因果推断的匹配方法:综述与展望
Stat Sci. 2010 Feb 1;25(1):1-21. doi: 10.1214/09-STS313.
4
Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.边缘结构模型与流行病学中的因果推断
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011.