• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏分配的急症圈模型对多脏器移植候选者的影响。

Impact of the acuity circle model for liver allocation on multivisceral transplant candidates.

作者信息

Ivanics Tommy, Vianna Rodrigo, Kubal Chandrashekhar A, Iyer Kishore R, Mazariegos George V, Matsumoto Cal S, Mangus Richard, Beduschi Thiago, Abouljoud Marwan, Fridell Jonathan A, Nagai Shunji

机构信息

Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan, USA.

Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2022 Feb;22(2):464-473. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16803. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.16803
PMID:34403552
Abstract

Liver allocation was updated on February 4, 2020, replacing a Donor Service Area (DSA) with acuity circles (AC). The impact on waitlist outcomes for patients listed for combined liver-intestine transplantation (multivisceral transplantation [MVT]) remains unknown. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify all candidates listed for both liver and intestine between January 1, 2018 and March 5, 2021. Two eras were defined: pre-AC (2018-2020) and post-AC (2020-2021). Outcomes included 90-day waitlist mortality and transplant probability. A total of 127 adult and 104 pediatric MVT listings were identified. In adults, the 90-day waitlist mortality was not statistically significantly different, but transplant probability was lower post-AC. After risk-adjustment, post-AC was associated with a higher albeit not statistically significantly different mortality hazard (sub-distribution hazard ratio[sHR]: 8.45, 95% CI: 0.96-74.05; p = .054), but a significantly lower transplant probability (sHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.75; p = .008). For pediatric patients, waitlist mortality and transplant probability were similar between eras. The proportion of patients who underwent transplant with exception points was lower post-AC both in adult (44% to 9%; p = .04) and pediatric recipients (65% to 15%; p = .002). A lower transplant probability observed in adults listed for MVT may ultimately result in increased waitlist mortality. Efforts should be taken to ensure equitable organ allocation in this vulnerable patient population.

摘要

肝脏分配于2020年2月4日更新,用 acuity circles(AC)取代了捐赠服务区(DSA)。对于联合肝脏-肠道移植(多脏器移植 [MVT])登记患者的等待名单结果的影响仍不清楚。器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库用于识别2018年1月1日至2021年3月5日期间所有登记肝脏和肠道移植的候选人。定义了两个时期:AC前(2018 - 2020年)和AC后(2020 - 2021年)。结果包括90天等待名单死亡率和移植概率。共识别出127例成人和104例儿科MVT登记。在成人中,90天等待名单死亡率无统计学显著差异,但AC后移植概率较低。风险调整后,AC后与更高的死亡率风险相关,尽管无统计学显著差异(亚分布风险比 [sHR]:8.45,95%置信区间:0.96 - 74.05;p = 0.054),但移植概率显著更低(sHR:0.33,95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.75;p = 0.008)。对于儿科患者,不同时期的等待名单死亡率和移植概率相似。使用例外点进行移植的患者比例在AC后成人(从44%降至9%;p = 0.04)和儿科受者(从65%降至15%;p = 0.002)中均较低。在登记MVT的成人中观察到的较低移植概率最终可能导致等待名单死亡率增加。应努力确保在这一脆弱患者群体中实现公平的器官分配。

相似文献

1
Impact of the acuity circle model for liver allocation on multivisceral transplant candidates.肝脏分配的急症圈模型对多脏器移植候选者的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Feb;22(2):464-473. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16803. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
2
Excess waitlist mortality among candidates for multivisceral liver-intestine transplant in acuity circle allocation.急性环分配中多脏器肝肠移植候选者的过度候补名单死亡率。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jun;24(6):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.021. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
3
Effects of the implementation of acuity circle policy on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of liver re-transplantation. acuity 圈政策的实施对肝移植再次等待名单和移植后结果的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14977. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14977. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
4
The Effect of New Acuity Circle Policy on Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in the United States.新视力圈政策对美国肝肾联合移植的影响。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):101296. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
5
Nonstandard Exception Requests Impact Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.非标准例外请求影响小儿肝移植候选者的结局。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3181-3191. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13879. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
A Share 21 model in liver transplantation: Impact on waitlist outcomes.肝移植中的A Share 21模型:对等待名单结果的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Aug;20(8):2184-2197. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15836. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
7
Association of Body Surface Area With Access to Deceased Donor Liver Transplant and Novel Allocation Policies.体表面积与获取已故供体肝移植和新分配政策的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):610-616. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0191.
8
Effect of Mandatory 6-Month Waiting Period on Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.强制性 6 个月等待期对肝癌患者等待名单和移植结果的影响。
Hepatology. 2020 Dec;72(6):2051-2062. doi: 10.1002/hep.31223. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
9
Justifying Nonstandard Exception Requests for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates: An Analysis of Narratives Submitted to the United Network for Organ Sharing, 2009-2014.为小儿肝移植候选者的非标准例外请求提供理由:对2009年至2014年提交给器官共享联合网络的叙述的分析
Am J Transplant. 2017 Aug;17(8):2144-2154. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14216. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
10
Impact of Acuity Circles on Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.急性病轮候圈对儿科肝移植候选者结局的影响。
Transplantation. 2020 Aug;104(8):1627-1632. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003079.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease.联合器官移植治疗晚期肝病患者。
Semin Liver Dis. 2024 Aug;44(3):369-382. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788674. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
The Effect of New Acuity Circle Policy on Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation in the United States.新视力圈政策对美国肝肾联合移植的影响。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):101296. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Global liver transplantation: emerging trends and ethical challenges.全球肝移植:新兴趋势与伦理挑战。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 25;408(1):418. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03144-4.
4
Acuity circles allocation policy impact on waitlist mortality and donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: A nationwide retrospective analysis.敏锐度圈分配政策对等待名单死亡率及心脏死亡后肝移植捐献的影响:一项全国性回顾性分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e1066. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1066. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Disparities in the Effects of Acuity Circle-based Liver Allocation on Waitlist and Transplant Practice Between Centers.基于视力圈的肝脏分配对各中心等待名单和移植实践影响的差异。
Transplant Direct. 2022 Sep 26;8(10):e1356. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001356. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Organ allocation in pediatric abdominal transplant.儿科腹部移植中的器官分配。
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jun;31(3):151180. doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2022.151180. Epub 2022 May 16.