Kim Hongsik, Kim Hana, Lee Minsang, Kwon Minsuk, Hong Jung Yong, Lee Jeeyun, Lim Ho Yeong, Kang Won Ki, Kim Seung Tae
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Cancer. 2021 Jul 25;12(18):5681-5686. doi: 10.7150/jca.62853. eCollection 2021.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show clinical benefit in patients with refractory advanced gastric cancer (GC). The ICIs in routine clinical practice have been used in various treatment lines. Therefore, we investigated the timing for application of ICI in patients with refractory advanced GC. We analyzed 187 patients with refractory advanced or recurrent GC who received ICIS as a 3rd- or 4th-line treatment between September 2015 and October 2020. Clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated. Among 187 patients, 105 received ICIs as a 3rd-line treatment and 82 as a 4th line. The ORR for ICIs was 10.5% (11/105) in 3rd line and 8.5% (7/82) in 4th line. The DCR for ICIs was 36.2% (38/105) in 3rd-line treatment and 31.7% (26/82) in 4th line. There was no significant difference for ORR ( = 0.819) or DCR ( = 0.870). The median PFS and OS to ICIs was 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8 months) and 4.4 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 7.2 months) in 3rd line and 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.3 months) and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 3.4 months) in 4th line. The median PFS and OS to ICIs was not different between 3rd line and 4th line ( = 0.495 and =0.208, respectively). There were also no significant difference for PFS and OS between PD-L1-positive tumors (CPS≥1) and PD-L1-negative tumors ( = 0.910 and =0.931, respectively). ICIs showed similar clinical benefits in the 3rd-line and 4th-line settings. ICIs might be a reasonable approach for patients with refractory GC in the setting of 3rd-line or 4th-line treatment options.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在难治性晚期胃癌(GC)患者中显示出临床获益。常规临床实践中的ICIs已用于不同的治疗线数。因此,我们研究了ICI在难治性晚期GC患者中的应用时机。我们分析了2015年9月至2020年10月期间接受ICIs作为三线或四线治疗的187例难治性晚期或复发性GC患者。评估了总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)的临床结局。在187例患者中,105例接受ICIs作为三线治疗,82例作为四线治疗。ICIs的ORR在三线治疗中为10.5%(11/105),在四线治疗中为8.5%(7/82)。ICIs的DCR在三线治疗中为36.2%(38/105),在四线治疗中为31.7%(26/82)。ORR(P = 0.819)或DCR(P = 0.870)无显著差异。ICIs的中位PFS和OS在三线治疗中分别为1.4个月(95%CI,1.1至1.8个月)和4.4个月(95%CI,1.6至7.2个月),在四线治疗中分别为1.8个月(95%CI,1.4至2.3个月)和2.8个月(95%CI,2.2至3.4个月)。ICIs的中位PFS和OS在三线和四线之间无差异(分别为P = 0.495和P = 0.208)。PD-L1阳性肿瘤(CPS≥1)和PD-L1阴性肿瘤之间的PFS和OS也无显著差异(分别为P = 0.910和P = 0.931)。ICIs在三线和四线治疗中显示出相似的临床获益。对于三线或四线治疗选择的难治性GC患者,ICIs可能是一种合理的治疗方法。