Suppr超能文献

维生素 D 与肌肉健康:随机安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Vitamin D and Muscle Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Sep;36(9):1651-1660. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4412. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on muscle health. For this systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials, a systematic search of randomized controlled trials published until October 2020 was performed in Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar. We included studies in humans (except athletes) on supplementation with vitamin D2 or D3 versus placebo, regardless of administration form (daily, bolus, and duration) with or without calcium co-supplementation. The predefined endpoints were physical performance reported as timed up and go test (TUG; seconds), chair rising test (seconds), 6-minute walking distance (m), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; points). Furthermore, endpoints were maximum muscle strength (Newton) measured at handgrip, elbow flexion, elbow extension, knee flexion, and knee extension, as well as muscle (lean tissue) mass (kg). Falls were not included in the analysis. Cochrane Review Manager (version 5.4.1.) calculating mean difference (MD) using a random effect model was used. In total, 54 randomized controlled trials involving 8747 individuals were included. Vitamin D versus placebo was associated with a significantly longer time spent performing the TUG (MD 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.26] seconds, N = 19 studies, I  = 0%, n = 5223 participants) and a significant lower maximum knee flexion strength (MD -3.3 [-6.63 to -0.03] Newton, N = 12 studies, I  = 0%, n = 765 participants). Total score in the SPPB showed a tendency toward worsening in response to vitamin D compared with placebo (MD -0.18 [-0.37 to 0.01] points, N = 8 studies, I  = 0%, n = 856 participants). Other measures of muscle health did not show between-group differences. In subgroup analyses, including studies with low vitamin D levels, effects of vitamin D supplementation did not differ from placebo. Available evidence does not support a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle health. Vitamin D may have adverse effects on muscle health, which needs to be considered when recommending vitamin D supplementation. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

摘要

本研究旨在探讨维生素 D 补充与安慰剂对肌肉健康的影响。为此,我们对截至 2020 年 10 月发表的安慰剂对照试验进行了系统检索,检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Google Scholar 中的随机对照试验。我们纳入了补充维生素 D2 或 D3 与安慰剂的人类(不包括运动员)的研究,无论给药形式(每日、大剂量和持续时间)如何,无论是否联合钙补充。预设的终点是作为计时起坐测试(TUG;秒)、坐起测试(秒)、6 分钟步行距离(m)和简短体能测试(SPPB;分)报告的身体表现。此外,终点还包括握力、肘屈伸、肘伸展、膝屈伸和膝伸展时的最大肌肉力量(牛顿),以及肌肉(瘦组织)质量(kg)。未将跌倒纳入分析。使用 Cochrane Review Manager(版本 5.4.1)计算使用随机效应模型的均数差(MD)。共纳入 54 项随机对照试验,涉及 8747 人。与安慰剂相比,维生素 D 与 TUG 时间明显延长(MD 0.15 [95%置信区间(CI)0.03 至 0.26]秒,N=19 项研究,I=0%,n=5223 名参与者)和最大膝屈伸强度显著降低(MD-3.3 [-6.63 至 -0.03]牛顿,N=12 项研究,I=0%,n=765 名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,SPPB 的总评分显示出维生素 D 治疗后恶化的趋势(MD-0.18 [-0.37 至 0.01]分,N=8 项研究,I=0%,n=856 名参与者)。其他肌肉健康指标未显示组间差异。在包括维生素 D 水平较低的研究的亚组分析中,维生素 D 补充的效果与安慰剂无差异。现有证据不支持维生素 D 补充对肌肉健康有益。维生素 D 可能对肌肉健康有不良影响,在推荐维生素 D 补充时需要考虑这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验