• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基础疼痛变异性对周围神经性疼痛随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验中安慰剂反应的影响。

Impact of variability in baseline pain on the placebo response in randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trials in peripheral neuropathic pain.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurology Research Unit, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Pain. 2022 Mar 1;163(3):483-488. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002374.

DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002374
PMID:34407033
Abstract

Large placebo responses often negatively affect randomized controlled trials within the pain area. Understanding different possible factors that influence the placebo response is therefore important. In this retrospective analysis, we hypothesized that a large variability in baseline pain score would predict a greater placebo response and analyzed the impact of the coefficient of variation, SD, and difference between the highest and lowest numeric rating scale (NRS) score at baseline on the placebo response. A total of 160 observations on placebo response from 3 controlled clinical trials with a crossover design were included in this study. In general, the placebo response was low with a mean reduction in pain intensity of 0.5 points (range -5 to 7) measured on a 0 to 10 point NRS, and only 15% were placebo responders as defined by more than 30% reduction in NRS pain score from baseline to the end of the placebo treatment period. We found no significant impact of baseline pain coefficient of variation, SD, or the difference between lowest and highest baseline pain score on the placebo response. Placebo response in one trial did not predict placebo response in another trial. A large placebo response was not associated with a large treatment response. In conclusion, in this retrospective data analysis, there was no impact of baseline pain variability on the placebo response in controlled clinical trials with a crossover design in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

摘要

大的安慰剂反应常对疼痛领域的随机对照试验产生负面影响。因此,了解影响安慰剂反应的不同可能因素非常重要。在这项回顾性分析中,我们假设基线疼痛评分的较大变异性将预测更大的安慰剂反应,并分析了基线时变异系数、标准差和最高与最低数字评定量表 (NRS) 评分之间差异对安慰剂反应的影响。本研究共纳入了 3 项交叉设计的对照临床试验中 160 个安慰剂反应观察值。总体而言,安慰剂反应较低,疼痛强度平均降低 0.5 分(范围为-5 至 7),采用 0 至 10 分 NRS 进行测量,仅有 15%的患者被定义为安慰剂反应者,即 NRS 疼痛评分从基线到安慰剂治疗结束时降低超过 30%。我们发现基线疼痛变异系数、标准差或最低和最高基线疼痛评分之间的差异对安慰剂反应均无显著影响。一项试验中的安慰剂反应不能预测另一项试验中的安慰剂反应。大的安慰剂反应与大的治疗反应无关。总之,在这项回顾性数据分析中,在伴有周围神经性疼痛的交叉设计对照临床试验中,基线疼痛变异性对安慰剂反应没有影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of variability in baseline pain on the placebo response in randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trials in peripheral neuropathic pain.基础疼痛变异性对周围神经性疼痛随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验中安慰剂反应的影响。
Pain. 2022 Mar 1;163(3):483-488. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002374.
2
Factors with impact on magnitude of the placebo response in randomized, controlled, cross-over trials in peripheral neuropathic pain.在外周神经性疼痛的随机、对照、交叉试验中,对安慰剂反应程度有影响的因素。
Pain. 2020 Dec;161(12):2731-2736. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001964.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin using a flexible, optimized dose schedule in Korean patients with peripheral neuropathic pain: a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.普瑞巴林灵活优化剂量方案治疗韩国外周神经性疼痛患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 10 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2370-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.014.
4
Herbal medicinal products or preparations for neuropathic pain.用于神经性疼痛的草药产品或制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 2;4(4):CD010528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010528.pub4.
5
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot trial with extension using an oral mucosal cannabinoid extract for treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.一项双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉先导试验,并采用口服黏膜大麻素提取物进行扩展试验,用于治疗化疗引起的神经性疼痛。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and open-label extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验及开放标签扩展研究,以评估普瑞巴林治疗与人类免疫缺陷病毒神经病变相关的神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性。
Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
7
Enriched enrollment randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial with phenytoin cream in painful chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (EPHENE): a study protocol.富含苯妥英乳膏的疼痛性慢性特发性轴索性多发性神经病(EPHENE)的纳入随机双盲安慰剂对照交叉试验:研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 22;23(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06806-8.
8
The Efficacy of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Prediabetic Neuropathic Pain.普瑞巴林治疗糖尿病前期神经病理性疼痛的疗效
Clin J Pain. 2016 Nov;32(11):927-932. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000339.
9
Analgesic efficacy and safety of the novel p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, losmapimod, in patients with neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.新型 p38 MAP 激酶抑制剂洛索洛芬在周围神经损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者中的镇痛疗效和安全性:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):844-57. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00256.x. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
10
An investigation of factors contributing to higher levels of placebo response in clinical trials in neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对导致神经病理性疼痛临床试验中更高水平安慰剂反应的因素的调查:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Feb;35(2):67-81. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0259-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of intraindividual pain variability on functional pain outcomes among adults with chronic pain: an ecological momentary assessment study.个体内疼痛变异性对慢性疼痛成人功能疼痛结局的影响:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
J Behav Med. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00590-x.
2
Predicting Treatment Responses in Patients With Osteoarthritis: Results From Two Phase III Tanezumab Randomized Clinical Trials.预测骨关节炎患者的治疗反应:两项三期替扎尼定随机临床试验结果。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Apr;113(4):878-886. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2842. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Relations between short-term memory and the within-subject variability of experimental pain intensity reports: Results from healthy and Fibromyalgia patients.
短期记忆与实验性疼痛强度报告的个体内变异性之间的关系:健康人和纤维肌痛患者的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277402. eCollection 2022.
4
On the Relationship Between Pain Variability and Relief in Randomized Clinical Trials.随机临床试验中疼痛变异性与缓解之间的关系
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 8;3:844309. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.844309. eCollection 2022.