• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对生理弯曲升主动脉假体患者血液动力学的综合分析。

Comprehensive analysis of haemodynamics in patients with physiologically curved prostheses of the ascending aorta.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;62(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab352.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezab352
PMID:34409435
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This is a comprehensive analysis of haemodynamics after valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) with anatomically curved prosthesis (CP) compared to straight prosthesis (SP) and age-matched volunteers (VOL) using 4D flow MRI (time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging).

METHODS

Nine patients with 90° CP, nine patients with SP, and twelve VOL were examined with 4D flow MRI. Analyses included various characteristic anatomical, qualitative and quantitative haemodynamic parameters.

RESULTS

Grading of secondary flow patterns was lower in CP patients than in SP patients (P = 0.09) and more comparable to VOL, albeit not reaching statistical significance. However, it was easy to differentiate between VSARR patients and healthy volunteers: Patients more often had angular aortic arches (CP: 89%, SP: 100%; VOL: 17%; P ≤ 0.002), increased average curvature (CP: 0.17/cm [0.15, 0.18]; SP: 0.15/cm [0.14, 0.16]; VOL: 0.14/cm [0.13, 0.16]; P ≤ 0.007; values given as median [interquartile range]), and more secondary flow patterns (CP: 3 [2, 4] SP: 3 [2, 3] VOL: 2 [1, 2]; P < 0.01). Maximum circulation (CP: 142.7 cm2/s [116.1, 187.3]; SP: 101.8 cm2/s [77.7, 132.5]; VOL: 42.8cm2/s [39.3, 65.6]; P ≤ 0.002), maximum helicity density (CP: 9.6 m/s2 [9.3, 23.9]; SP: 9.7 m/s2 [8.6, 12.5]; VOL 4.9 m/s2 [4.2, 7.7]; P ≤ 0.007), and wall shear stress gradient (e.g., proximal ascending aorta CP: 0.97 N/m2 [0.54, 1.07]; SP: 1.08 N/m2 [0.74, 1.24]; VOL: 0.41 N/m2 [0.32, 0.60]; P ≤ 0.01) were increased in patients. One CP patient had a round aortic arch with physiological haemodynamic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The restoration of physiological aortic configuration and haemodynamics was not fully achieved with the curved prostheses in our study cohort. However, there was a tendency towards improved haemodynamic conditions in the patients with curved prostheses overall but without statistical significance. A single patient with a CP and near-physiological configuration of the thoracic aorta underlines the importance of optimizing postoperative geometric conditions for allowing for physiological haemodynamics and cardiovascular energetics after VSARR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用 4D 流 MRI(时相对比磁共振三维成像)对保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部置换术后(VSARR)采用解剖学曲度人工血管(CP)与直型人工血管(SP)的血流动力学进行全面分析,并与年龄匹配的志愿者(VOL)进行比较。

方法

对 9 例 CP 患者、9 例 SP 患者和 12 例 VOL 进行了 4D 流 MRI 检查。分析包括各种特征解剖、定性和定量血流动力学参数。

结果

CP 患者的次级血流模式分级低于 SP 患者(P=0.09),与 VOL 更相似,但无统计学意义。然而,VSARR 患者与健康志愿者之间很容易区分:患者的主动脉弓更常呈角状(CP:89%,SP:100%;VOL:17%;P≤0.002),平均曲率增加(CP:0.17/cm [0.15,0.18];SP:0.15/cm [0.14,0.16];VOL:0.14/cm [0.13,0.16];P≤0.007;中位数[四分位间距]),且次级血流模式更多(CP:3 [2,4] SP:3 [2,3] VOL:2 [1,2];P<0.01)。最大循环(CP:142.7 cm2/s [116.1,187.3];SP:101.8 cm2/s [77.7,132.5];VOL:42.8cm2/s [39.3,65.6];P≤0.002)、最大螺旋密度(CP:9.6 m/s2 [9.3,23.9];SP:9.7 m/s2 [8.6,12.5];VOL 4.9 m/s2 [4.2,7.7];P≤0.007)和壁面切应力梯度(例如,升主动脉近端 CP:0.97 N/m2 [0.54,1.07];SP:1.08 N/m2 [0.74,1.24];VOL:0.41 N/m2 [0.32,0.60];P≤0.01)在患者中增加。1 例 CP 患者的主动脉弓呈圆形,血流动力学参数呈生理性。

结论

在我们的研究队列中,采用曲型人工血管并未完全恢复生理性主动脉结构和血流动力学。然而,总体上使用曲型人工血管的患者有改善血流动力学状况的趋势,但无统计学意义。1 例 CP 患者的胸主动脉具有近乎生理性的解剖结构,这突显了优化术后几何条件对于允许 VSARR 后生理性血流动力学和心血管能量的重要性。

相似文献

1
Comprehensive analysis of haemodynamics in patients with physiologically curved prostheses of the ascending aorta.对生理弯曲升主动脉假体患者血液动力学的综合分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;62(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab352.
2
Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.时分辨 3 维磁共振相位对比成像(4DFlowMRI)显示,在保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部置换术后患者的升主动脉中,血流模式发生改变。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;159(3):798-810.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.127. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study.4D 血流 CMR 分析比较解剖形状主动脉窦假体、管状假体和健康受试者的壁面切应力梯度:一项病例对照研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Aug 10;22(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00653-9.
4
4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after aortic root replacement with long-valved decellularized aortic homografts: comparison to valve-sparing aortic root replacement and healthy controls.主动脉根部置换术后带瓣去细胞同种异体主动脉移植的 4D-flow 心脏磁共振成像:与保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术和健康对照组的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 27;61(6):1307-1315. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac016.
5
Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.采用解剖形状窦假体行保留瓣膜主动脉根部修复的血液动力学的时间分辨三维磁共振相位对比成像(4D Flow MRI)分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;152(2):418-427.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
6
Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit.使用带机械瓣膜的管道进行主动脉根部置换后异常主动脉血流动力学的改善
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;23(3):416-23. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw173. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.三尖瓣和二尖瓣形态的保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术后的四维血流磁共振成像血流动力学结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May;45(5):818-25. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt526. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
8
Comparison of Hemodynamics After Aortic Root Replacement Using Valve-Sparing or Bioprosthetic Valved Conduit.使用保留瓣膜或生物人工带瓣管道进行主动脉根部置换术后的血流动力学比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.109. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
9
Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.升主动脉置换术后主动脉瓣血流特征的 4D-flow MRI 初步研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;170(3):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.使用心脏磁共振成像和计算建模技术对BioValsalva™复合瓣膜-管道移植物的形态和血流动力学功能进行体内评估。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec 9;9:193. doi: 10.1186/s13019-014-0193-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of valve-sparing aortic root replacement on aortic fluid dynamics and biomechanics in patients with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic disease.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术对综合征性遗传性胸主动脉疾病患者主动脉流体动力学和生物力学的影响。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101088. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101088. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after aortic root replacement with long-valved decellularized aortic homografts: comparison to valve-sparing aortic root replacement and healthy controls.主动脉根部置换术后带瓣去细胞同种异体主动脉移植的 4D-flow 心脏磁共振成像:与保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术和健康对照组的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 27;61(6):1307-1315. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac016.