Kirnaz Sertac, Kocharian Gary, Sommer Fabian, McGrath Lynn B, Goldberg Jacob L, Härtl Roger
Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Oct 13;21(5):E452-E453. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab289.
Giant disc herniation (GDH) is generally defined as a lumbar disc herniation that obstructs 50% or more of the space in the spinal canal.1-3 Common treatment options for GDH include unilateral interlaminar approach, bilateral approach, or open full laminectomy.4,5 Surgical treatment of GDH may be challenging because severe bilateral compression of neural elements in the spinal canal increases the risk of iatrogenic injury to nerve roots and dura. The surgical approach can be further complicated by calcification, hardening, and dehydration of the GDH tissue. The prevailing opinion in the literature is that giant disc herniations cannot safely be treated via tubular minimally invasive approaches.5-7 In this video, we present a case of a 52-yr-old male patient with a history of progressive low back pain that radiates bilaterally from the buttocks toward the posterior legs and knees for 2 yr because of a GDH at the L4-5 level. The patient was treated via a tubular "over-the-top" minimally invasive decompression in order to first provide generous bilateral decompression of neural elements and dura.8,9 After sufficient decompression at the surgical level, the discectomy was performed via an ipsilateral piecemeal resection of the GDH. The "over-the-top" contralateral mobilization of disc herniation was also achieved with this approach, which facilitated the removal of the entire disc fragment. Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure. Therefore, GDH should not be considered as a contraindication for tubular decompression when this modified technique is performed.
巨大椎间盘突出症(GDH)通常被定义为腰椎间盘突出症,其阻塞椎管内50%或更多的空间。1-3 GDH的常见治疗选择包括单侧椎板间入路、双侧入路或开放性全椎板切除术。4,5 GDH的手术治疗可能具有挑战性,因为椎管内神经组织的严重双侧受压会增加医源性神经根和硬脊膜损伤的风险。GDH组织的钙化、硬化和脱水会使手术入路进一步复杂化。文献中的普遍观点是,巨大椎间盘突出症无法通过管状微创入路安全治疗。5-7 在本视频中,我们展示了一例52岁男性患者的病例,该患者因L4-5水平的GDH,出现渐进性下背痛2年,疼痛从臀部双侧向后腿和膝盖放射。患者接受了管状“经顶”微创减压治疗,以便首先对神经组织和硬脊膜进行充分的双侧减压。8,9 在手术层面进行充分减压后,通过对GDH进行同侧逐块切除来进行椎间盘切除术。这种方法还实现了椎间盘突出症的“经顶”对侧移位,这有助于移除整个椎间盘碎片。在进行手术前已获得患者同意。因此,当采用这种改良技术时,GDH不应被视为管状减压的禁忌证。