Chou Joseph Teyu, Fu Chien-Hao
Department of Public Finance, National Chengchi University, Taipei, 116 Taiwan.
Department of Public Finance, National Taipei University, New Taipei City, 237 Taiwan.
J Fam Econ Issues. 2022;43(3):433-451. doi: 10.1007/s10834-021-09785-1. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
This paper examines the changes in vertical equity across different types of tax filing families during the span of a series of drastic personal income tax reforms in Taiwan. The newly enacted 2016 Taxpayer Rights Protection Act has brought unprecedented challenges to the tax authority's distributional goal and revenue stability. Utilizing the administrative tax return data collected by the Ministry of Finance's Fiscal Information Agency between 2016 and 2018, we show that while the income tax has contributed to improving equality in income distribution, the effects, however, were limited and even declined slightly in recent years. We also found that distributions of tax benefits are generally regressive, especially among itemized and special deductions. It is also shown that the personal exemption and the adjustments of basic living expenses provided comparably more relief to households with dependents than to those claiming no dependents. According to our two-parameter metric encompassing the usage rates and the tax-benefit distributions for each deduction, we found that itemized deductions and special deductions, in general, are regressive. Specifically, we calculate and compare different representative families' tax payments before and after the reform. While the tax reform has helped reduce many tax-filing families' tax liabilities, most tax benefits generated from the expansion of exemptions and deductions would likely be enjoyed by families with higher incomes. In a broader reform-minded context, the analysis cautions the tax authority in Taiwan and equity pursuing policy makers in other countries not to prioritize an overarching short-term equity goal over long-term revenue stabilization. Phasing out or capping some of the itemized deductions such as donations and special deductions related to discretionary purchasing decisions looks to be a promising reform path toward improving equity and restoring revenue stability.
本文考察了在台湾一系列剧烈的个人所得税改革期间,不同类型报税家庭纵向公平性的变化。新颁布的2016年《纳税人权利保护法》给税务机关的分配目标和税收稳定性带来了前所未有的挑战。利用财政部财政资讯中心在2016年至2018年期间收集的行政纳税申报数据,我们发现,虽然所得税有助于改善收入分配的公平性,但其效果有限,近年来甚至略有下降。我们还发现,税收优惠的分配总体上是累退的,特别是在分项扣除和特别扣除方面。研究还表明,个人免税额和基本生活费用调整为有受抚养人的家庭提供的减免比无受抚养人的家庭更多。根据我们涵盖每项扣除的使用率和税收优惠分配的双参数指标,我们发现分项扣除和特别扣除总体上是累退的。具体而言,我们计算并比较了不同代表性家庭在改革前后的纳税情况。虽然税收改革有助于减少许多报税家庭的纳税义务,但免税和扣除扩大产生的大部分税收优惠可能会被高收入家庭享有。在更具改革意识的背景下,该分析提醒台湾的税务机关以及其他国家追求公平的政策制定者,不要将总体短期公平目标置于长期税收稳定之上。逐步取消或限制一些分项扣除,如捐赠以及与自由裁量购买决策相关的特别扣除,似乎是改善公平性和恢复税收稳定性的一条有前景的改革途径。