Doi Suhail A R, Bashir Mohammed, Sheehan Michael T, Onitilo Adedayo A, Chivese Tawanda, Ibrahim Ibrahim M, Beer Stephen F, Furuya-Kanamori Luis, Abou-Samra Abdul-Badi, McIntyre H David
Department of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Division of Endocrinology and Qatar Metabolic Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Feb;16(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
Disagreement about the appropriate criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) persists. This study examines an alternative approach which combines information from all time-points on the glucose tolerance test (GTT) into a single index and expands the GDM spectrum into four categories using data from three geographically and ethnically distinct populations.
A retrospective observational study design was used. Data from Wisconsin, USA (723 women) was used in derivation of the criterion and data from Doha, Qatar (1284 women) and Cape Town, South Africa (220 women) for confirmation. Pregnant women without pre-existing diabetes with a GTT done between 23 and 30 weeks gestation were included. A novel index was derived from the GTT termed the weighted average glucose (wAG). This was categorized into four pre-defined groups (henceforth National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) criterion); i) normal gestational glycemia (NGG), ii) impaired gestational glycemia (IGG), iii) GDM and iv) high risk GDM (hGDM).
In the Doha cohort, compared to the NGG group, the odds of large for gestational age babies increased 1.33 fold (P = 0.432), 2.86 fold (P < 0.001) and 3.35 fold (P < 0.001) in the IGG, GDM and hGDM groups respectively. The odds of pregnancy induced hypertension increased 2.10 fold (P = 0.024) in GDM & hGDM groups compared to the IGG and NGG groups. In the Cape Town cohort, a third of women in the GDM group and two-thirds in the hGDM group progressed to T2DM at 5 years.
The NPRP categorization identifies four distinct risk clusters of glycemia in pregnancy which may aid better decision making in routine management, avoid potential over-diagnosis of women at lower risk of complications and assist with diabetes prevention in women at high-risk after an index pregnancy with GDM.
关于妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)诊断的适当标准仍存在分歧。本研究探讨了一种替代方法,该方法将葡萄糖耐量试验(GTT)所有时间点的信息整合为一个单一指标,并利用来自三个地理和种族不同人群的数据将GDM谱扩展为四类。
采用回顾性观察性研究设计。美国威斯康星州(723名女性)的数据用于推导该标准,卡塔尔多哈(1284名女性)和南非开普敦(220名女性)的数据用于验证。纳入妊娠23至30周期间进行GTT且无既往糖尿病史的孕妇。从GTT中得出一个新的指标,称为加权平均血糖(wAG)。将其分为四个预先定义的组(以下简称国家优先研究计划(NPRP)标准);i)正常妊娠血糖(NGG),ii)妊娠血糖受损(IGG),iii)GDM和iv)高风险GDM(hGDM)。
在多哈队列中,与NGG组相比,IGG、GDM和hGDM组中大于胎龄儿的几率分别增加了1.33倍(P = 0.432)、2.86倍(P < 0.001)和3.35倍(P < 0.001)。与IGG和NGG组相比,GDM和hGDM组中妊娠高血压的几率增加了2.10倍(P = 0.024)。在开普敦队列中,GDM组三分之一的女性和hGDM组三分之二的女性在5年后进展为2型糖尿病。
NPRP分类识别出妊娠期间四个不同的血糖风险簇,这可能有助于在常规管理中做出更好的决策,避免对并发症风险较低的女性进行潜在的过度诊断,并有助于在首次妊娠患有GDM的高风险女性中预防糖尿病。